LLM Comparison

Claude Fable 5 vs GLM-5.2: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Claude Fable 5 vs GLM-5.2 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardClaude Fable 5 model pageGLM-5.2 model page
Rank #1 vs #11AskClash overall scores 91.9 vs 70.8.
Pricing $10.0/$50.0 vs $1.40/$4.40Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightAnthropic vs Z.AI.

Claude Fable 5 vs GLM-5.2 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricClaude Fable 5GLM-5.2
Overall Score91.970.8
Leaderboard Rank#1#11
RWT9.08.5
Coding Agent Index77.274.4
HLE64.554.7
GPQA94.591.2
IFEval80.373.3
SWE-bench95.5—
SWE-Pro80.362.1
SWE-Atlas83.374.4
Terminal-Bench88.082.7
DeepSWE69.743.8
OSWorld85.0—
MCP Atlas—76.8
Finance Agent56.3—
CharXiv93.5—
MMMU-Pro92.7—
Tau289.299.1
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$10.0$1.40
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$50.0$4.40
Context Window1M+1M
Benchmarks Published1611

Claude Fable 5 vs GLM-5.2 head-to-head charts

Claude Fable 5 leads 10 and GLM-5.2 leads 1 of 11 shared benchmarks. GLM-5.2 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Fable 5GLM-5.2
Overall
91.9Claude Fable 5
70.8GLM-5.2
RWT
9.0Claude Fable 5
8.5GLM-5.2
Coding Agent Index
77.2Claude Fable 5
74.4GLM-5.2
HLE
64.5Claude Fable 5
54.7GLM-5.2
GPQA
94.5Claude Fable 5
91.2GLM-5.2
IFEval
80.3Claude Fable 5
73.3GLM-5.2
SWE-Pro
80.3Claude Fable 5
62.1GLM-5.2
SWE-Atlas
83.3Claude Fable 5
74.4GLM-5.2
Terminal-Bench
88.0Claude Fable 5
82.7GLM-5.2
DeepSWE
69.7Claude Fable 5
43.8GLM-5.2
Tau2
89.2Claude Fable 5
99.1GLM-5.2
Claude Fable 5
Input$10.0
Output$50.0
Workload$20
Context1M+
GLM-5.2
Input$1.40
Output$4.40
Workload$2.28
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Fable 5 and GLM-5.2 comparisons

Explore how Claude Fable 5 and GLM-5.2 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 SolGPT-5.6 Sol vs GLM-5.2Claude Fable 5 vs Kimi K3Kimi K3 vs GLM-5.2Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Opus 4.8 vs GLM-5.2Claude Fable 5 vs Grok 4.5Grok 4.5 vs GLM-5.2Claude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1Muse Spark 1.1 vs GLM-5.2

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.