Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
Claude Fable 5 vs Ling 3.1 Flash: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side Claude Fable 5 vs Ling 3.1 Flash comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Verdict: Claude Fable 5 ranks higher (#5 vs #25) and wins 2 of 2 shared benchmarks.
Rank #5 vs #25AskClash overall scores 73.4 vs 57.5.
Pricing $10.0/$50.0 vs —/—Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightAnthropic vs InclusionAI.
Claude Fable 5 vs Ling 3.1 Flash benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5 | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 73.4 | 57.5 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #5 | #25 |
| ACB | 64.6 | — |
| RWT | 9.0 | — |
| Coding Agent Index | 77.2 | — |
| HLE | 64.5 | 37.4 |
| GPQA | 94.5 | — |
| IFEval | 80.3 | — |
| SWE-bench | 95.5 | — |
| SWE-Pro | 80.3 | — |
| SWE-Atlas | 83.3 | — |
| Terminal-Bench | 42.4 | — |
| DeepSWE | 69.7 | — |
| GDPval-AA | 1932.5 | 1617.9 |
| OSWorld | 85.0 | — |
| MCP Atlas | — | 83.0 |
| Finance Agent | 56.3 | — |
| CharXiv | 93.5 | — |
| MMMU-Pro | 89.3 | — |
| ARC-AGI 2 | 89.2 | — |
| Tau2 | 89.2 | — |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $10.0 | — |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $50.0 | — |
| Context Window | 1M+ | 262K |
| Benchmarks Published | 16 | 6 |
Claude Fable 5 vs Ling 3.1 Flash head-to-head charts
Claude Fable 5 leads 3 and Ling 3.1 Flash leads 0 of 3 shared benchmarks. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
Claude Fable 5Ling 3.1 Flash
Overall
HLE
GDPval-AA
Claude Fable 5
Input$10.0
Output$50.0
Workload$20
Context1M+
Ling 3.1 Flash
Input—
Output—
Workload—
Context262K
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More Claude Fable 5 and Ling 3.1 Flash comparisons
Explore how Claude Fable 5 and Ling 3.1 Flash stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 5.5 vs Ling 3.1 FlashClaude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5.1 vs Ling 3.1 FlashClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Ling 3.1 FlashClaude Opus 5 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 5 vs Ling 3.1 FlashClaude Fable 5 vs Gemini 4 ArgonGemini 4 Argon vs Ling 3.1 Flash
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.