Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Ling 3.1 Flash: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side Claude Opus 5.5 vs Ling 3.1 Flash comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Verdict: Claude Opus 5.5 ranks higher (#1 vs #25) and wins 2 of 2 shared benchmarks.
Rank #1 vs #25AskClash overall scores 80.0 vs 57.5.
Pricing $4.00/$20.0 vs —/—Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightAnthropic vs InclusionAI.
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Ling 3.1 Flash benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 80.0 | 57.5 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #1 | #25 |
| ACB | 76.5 | — |
| HLE | 67.7 | 37.4 |
| SWE-Pro | 89.9 | — |
| Terminal-Bench | 59.6 | — |
| DeepSWE | 74.2 | — |
| GDPval-AA | 1846.2 | 1617.9 |
| MCP Atlas | — | 83.0 |
| Finance Agent | 58.6 | — |
| MMMU-Pro | 87.7 | — |
| ARC-AGI 2 | 91.7 | — |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $4.00 | — |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $20.0 | — |
| Context Window | 1M | 262K |
| Benchmarks Published | 12 | 6 |
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Ling 3.1 Flash head-to-head charts
Claude Opus 5.5 leads 3 and Ling 3.1 Flash leads 0 of 3 shared benchmarks. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
Claude Opus 5.5Ling 3.1 Flash
Overall
HLE
GDPval-AA
Claude Opus 5.5
Input$4.00
Output$20.0
Workload$8.00
Context1M
Ling 3.1 Flash
Input—
Output—
Workload—
Context262K
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More Claude Opus 5.5 and Ling 3.1 Flash comparisons
Explore how Claude Opus 5.5 and Ling 3.1 Flash stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5.1Claude Fable 5.1 vs Ling 3.1 FlashClaude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Ling 3.1 FlashClaude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Opus 5Claude Opus 5 vs Ling 3.1 FlashClaude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5 vs Ling 3.1 FlashClaude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 ArgonGemini 4 Argon vs Ling 3.1 Flash
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.