How do Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3.7 Plus compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3.7 Plus when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

AskClash compares Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3.7 Plus side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard Claude Sonnet 5 model page Qwen3.7 Plus model page

Rank #9 vs #21AskClash overall scores 76.2 vs 55.7.

Pricing $3.00/$15.0 vs $0.40/$1.60Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryAnthropic vs Alibaba.

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Claude Sonnet 5	Qwen3.7 Plus
Overall Score	76.2	55.7
Leaderboard Rank	#9	#21
RWT	8.5	7.5
HLE	57.4	34.7
GPQA	91.1	90.3
IFEval	—	94.6
SWE-bench	85.2	77.7
SWE-Pro	63.2	57.6
Terminal-Bench	80.4	70.3
DeepSWE	53.8	—
OSWorld	81.2	73.3
MCP Atlas	—	73.2
Finance Agent	—	38.2
CharXiv	88.3	85.9
MMMU-Pro	77.3	79.0
Tau2	—	93.0
MRCR	—	91.7
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$3.00	$0.40
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$15.0	$1.60
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	11	15

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus head-to-head charts

Claude Sonnet 5 leads 9 and Qwen3.7 Plus leads 1 of 10 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Sonnet 5Qwen3.7 Plus

Overall

76.2Claude Sonnet 5

55.7Qwen3.7 Plus

RWT

8.5Claude Sonnet 5

7.5Qwen3.7 Plus

HLE

57.4Claude Sonnet 5

34.7Qwen3.7 Plus

GPQA

91.1Claude Sonnet 5

90.3Qwen3.7 Plus

SWE-bench

85.2Claude Sonnet 5

77.7Qwen3.7 Plus

SWE-Pro

63.2Claude Sonnet 5

57.6Qwen3.7 Plus

Terminal-Bench

80.4Claude Sonnet 5

70.3Qwen3.7 Plus

OSWorld

81.2Claude Sonnet 5

73.3Qwen3.7 Plus

CharXiv

88.3Claude Sonnet 5

85.9Qwen3.7 Plus

MMMU-Pro

77.3Claude Sonnet 5

79.0Qwen3.7 Plus

Claude Sonnet 5

Input$3.00

Output$15.0

Workload$6.00

Context1M

Qwen3.7 Plus

Input$0.40

Output$1.60

Workload$0.72

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3.7 Plus comparisons

Explore how Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3.7 Plus stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5 Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Sonnet 5 GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.7 Plus Kimi K3 vs Claude Sonnet 5 Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.7 Plus Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Sonnet 5 Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3.7 Plus Grok 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5 Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.