How do Composer 2.5 and Hy3 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Composer 2.5 and Hy3 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Composer 2.5 vs Hy3: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: Composer 2.5 or Hy3?

AskClash compares Composer 2.5 and Hy3 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side Composer 2.5 vs Hy3 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard Composer 2.5 model page Hy3 model page

Rank #14 vs #18AskClash overall scores 67.0 vs 58.7.

Pricing $0.50/$2.50 vs $0.12/$0.43Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs Open WeightCursor vs Tencent.

Composer 2.5 vs Hy3 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Composer 2.5	Hy3
Overall Score	67.0	58.7
Leaderboard Rank	#14	#18
RWT	8.5	8.0
Coding Agent Index	51.8	—
HLE	—	53.2
GPQA	—	90.4
SWE-bench	—	78.0
SWE-Pro	47.0	57.9
SWE-Atlas	72.0	—
Terminal-Bench	69.3	71.7
MCP Atlas	—	79.1
Tau2	—	92.7
MRCR	—	75.1
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$0.50	$0.12
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$2.50	$0.43
Context Window	200K	256K
Benchmarks Published	4	9

Composer 2.5 vs Hy3 head-to-head charts

Composer 2.5 leads 2 and Hy3 leads 2 of 4 shared benchmarks. Hy3 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Composer 2.5Hy3

Overall

67.0Composer 2.5

58.7Hy3

RWT

8.5Composer 2.5

8.0Hy3

SWE-Pro

47.0Composer 2.5

57.9Hy3

Terminal-Bench

69.3Composer 2.5

71.7Hy3

Composer 2.5

Input$0.50

Output$2.50

Workload$1.00

Context200K

Hy3

Input$0.12

Output$0.43

Workload$0.21

Context256K

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Composer 2.5 and Hy3 comparisons

Explore how Composer 2.5 and Hy3 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5 vs Composer 2.5 Claude Fable 5 vs Hy3 GPT-5.6 Sol vs Composer 2.5 GPT-5.6 Sol vs Hy3 Kimi K3 vs Composer 2.5 Kimi K3 vs Hy3 Claude Opus 4.8 vs Composer 2.5 Claude Opus 4.8 vs Hy3 Grok 4.5 vs Composer 2.5 Grok 4.5 vs Hy3

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.