LLM Comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 model pageGemini 3.1 Pro model page
Rank #16 vs #28AskClash overall scores 56.1 vs 42.2.
Pricing $0.14/$0.28 vs $2.00/$12.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs ProprietaryDeepSeek vs Google.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Gemini 3.1 Pro
Overall Score56.142.2
Leaderboard Rank#16#28
Coding Agent Index—30.3
HLE37.051.4
GPQA91.094.3
MATH-50057.4—
SWE-bench79.080.6
SWE-Pro—54.2
Terminal-Bench82.768.5
DeepSWE54.411.8
MCP Atlas69.069.2
Finance Agent—43.0
CharXiv—80.2
MMMU-Pro—83.9
ARC-AGI 2—77.1
Tau2—99.3
MRCR78.784.9
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$0.14$2.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$0.28$12.0
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published916

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro head-to-head charts

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 leads 3 and Gemini 3.1 Pro leads 5 of 8 shared benchmarks. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Gemini 3.1 Pro
Overall
56.1DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
42.2Gemini 3.1 Pro
HLE
37.0DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
51.4Gemini 3.1 Pro
GPQA
91.0DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
94.3Gemini 3.1 Pro
SWE-bench
79.0DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
80.6Gemini 3.1 Pro
Terminal-Bench
82.7DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
68.5Gemini 3.1 Pro
DeepSWE
54.4DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
11.8Gemini 3.1 Pro
MCP Atlas
69.0DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
69.2Gemini 3.1 Pro
MRCR
78.7DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
84.9Gemini 3.1 Pro
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Input$0.14
Output$0.28
Workload$0.20
Context1M
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Input$2.00
Output$12.0
Workload$4.40
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Gemini 3.1 Pro comparisons

Explore how DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Gemini 3.1 Pro stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.1 ProClaude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.1 ProGPT-5.6 Sol vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731GPT-5.6 Sol vs Gemini 3.1 ProKimi K3 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Kimi K3 vs Gemini 3.1 ProClaude Opus 4.8 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.