LLM Comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Gemini 3.1 Pro comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp model pageGemini 3.1 Pro model page
Rank #19 vs #35AskClash overall scores 58.2 vs 40.8.
Pricing $0.14/$0.28 vs $2.00/$12.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
API vs ProprietaryDeepSeek vs Google.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Gemini 3.1 Pro benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGemini 3.1 Pro
Overall Score58.240.8
Leaderboard Rank#19#35
ACB58.6—
Coding Agent Index—32.9
HLE37.051.4
GPQA91.094.3
SWE-bench79.080.6
SWE-Pro—54.2
Terminal-Bench83.968.5
DeepSWE59.311.7
MCP Atlas69.069.2
Finance Agent49.543.0
CharXiv—80.2
MMMU-Pro—83.9
ARC-AGI 2—77.1
Tau2—99.3
MRCR78.784.9
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$0.14$2.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$0.28$12.0
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published1016

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Gemini 3.1 Pro head-to-head charts

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp leads 4 and Gemini 3.1 Pro leads 5 of 9 shared benchmarks. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGemini 3.1 Pro
Overall
58.2DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
40.8Gemini 3.1 Pro
HLE
37.0DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
51.4Gemini 3.1 Pro
GPQA
91.0DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
94.3Gemini 3.1 Pro
SWE-bench
79.0DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
80.6Gemini 3.1 Pro
Terminal-Bench
83.9DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
68.5Gemini 3.1 Pro
DeepSWE
59.3DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
11.7Gemini 3.1 Pro
MCP Atlas
69.0DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
69.2Gemini 3.1 Pro
Finance Agent
49.5DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
43.0Gemini 3.1 Pro
MRCR
78.7DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
84.9Gemini 3.1 Pro
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
Input$0.14
Output$0.28
Workload$0.20
Context1M
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Input$2.00
Output$12.0
Workload$4.40
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Gemini 3.1 Pro comparisons

Explore how DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Gemini 3.1 Pro stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpClaude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.1 ProClaude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpClaude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.1 ProGLM-5.3 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGLM-5.3 vs Gemini 3.1 ProGrok 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGrok 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 ProGPT-5.6 Sol vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGPT-5.6 Sol vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.