How do DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Gemini 3.7 Flash compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Gemini 3.7 Flash when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Gemini 3.7 Flash: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

AskClash compares DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Gemini 3.7 Flash side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Gemini 3.7 Flash comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp model page Gemini 3.7 Flash model page

Rank #19 vs #21AskClash overall scores 54.8 vs 54.5.

Pricing $0.14/$0.28 vs $1.50/$7.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

API vs ProprietaryDeepSeek vs Google.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Gemini 3.7 Flash benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp	Gemini 3.7 Flash
Overall Score	54.8	54.5
Leaderboard Rank	#19	#21
ACB	58.6	38.9
HLE	—	53.6
GPQA	—	94.5
Terminal-Bench	83.9	85.8
DeepSWE	59.3	65.3
GDPval-AA	—	1525.0
Finance Agent	—	59.0
CharXiv	—	84.5
MMMU-Pro	—	85.5
MRCR	—	97.0
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$0.14	$1.50
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$0.28	$7.50
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	3	11

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Gemini 3.7 Flash head-to-head charts

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp leads 2 and Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 2 of 4 shared benchmarks. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGemini 3.7 Flash

Overall

54.8DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

54.5Gemini 3.7 Flash

ACB

58.6DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

38.9Gemini 3.7 Flash

Terminal-Bench

83.9DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

85.8Gemini 3.7 Flash

DeepSWE

59.3DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

65.3Gemini 3.7 Flash

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

Input$0.14

Output$0.28

Workload$0.20

Context1M

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Input$1.50

Output$7.50

Workload$3.00

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Gemini 3.7 Flash comparisons

Explore how DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Gemini 3.7 Flash stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash GPT-5.6 Sol vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp GPT-5.6 Sol vs Gemini 3.7 Flash Claude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash Grok 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Grok 4.6 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.