How do DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and MiniMax-M3 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and MiniMax-M3 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs MiniMax-M3: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or MiniMax-M3?

AskClash compares DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and MiniMax-M3 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs MiniMax-M3 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp model page MiniMax-M3 model page

Rank #19 vs #25AskClash overall scores 58.2 vs 51.9.

Pricing $0.14/$0.28 vs $0.30/$1.20Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

API vs Open WeightDeepSeek vs MiniMax.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs MiniMax-M3 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp	MiniMax-M3
Overall Score	58.2	51.9
Leaderboard Rank	#19	#25
ACB	58.6	29.8
RWT	—	8.5
HLE	37.0	37.1
GPQA	91.0	92.9
IFEval	—	82.9
SWE-bench	79.0	80.5
SWE-Pro	—	59.0
Terminal-Bench	83.9	66.0
DeepSWE	59.3	—
OSWorld	—	70.1
MCP Atlas	69.0	74.2
Finance Agent	49.5	48.3
MMMU-Pro	—	78.1
Tau2	—	88.9
MRCR	78.7	—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$0.14	$0.30
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$0.28	$1.20
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	10	14

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs MiniMax-M3 head-to-head charts

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp leads 4 and MiniMax-M3 leads 4 of 8 shared benchmarks. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpMiniMax-M3

Overall

58.2DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

51.9MiniMax-M3

ACB

58.6DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

29.8MiniMax-M3

HLE

37.0DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

37.1MiniMax-M3

GPQA

91.0DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

92.9MiniMax-M3

SWE-bench

79.0DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

80.5MiniMax-M3

Terminal-Bench

83.9DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

66.0MiniMax-M3

MCP Atlas

69.0DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

74.2MiniMax-M3

Finance Agent

49.5DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

48.3MiniMax-M3

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

Input$0.14

Output$0.28

Workload$0.20

Context1M

MiniMax-M3

Input$0.30

Output$1.20

Workload$0.54

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and MiniMax-M3 comparisons

Explore how DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and MiniMax-M3 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Claude Opus 5 vs MiniMax-M3 Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Claude Fable 5 vs MiniMax-M3 GLM-5.3 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M3 Grok 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Grok 4.6 vs MiniMax-M3 GPT-5.6 Sol vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp GPT-5.6 Sol vs MiniMax-M3

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.