LLM Comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Hy3: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Hy3 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Rank #15 vs #25AskClash overall scores 61.1 vs 46.2.
Pricing $0.43/$0.87 vs $0.12/$0.43Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs Open WeightDeepSeek vs Tencent.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Hy3 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Hy3
Overall Score61.146.2
Leaderboard Rank#15#25
ACB54.7
RWT7.08.0
HLE42.753.2
GPQA90.190.4
SWE-bench80.678.0
SWE-Pro55.457.9
Terminal-Bench87.971.7
DeepSWE62.7
MCP Atlas73.679.1
Tau292.7
MRCR75.1
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$0.43$0.12
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$0.87$0.43
Context Window1M256K
Benchmarks Published99

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Hy3 head-to-head charts

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 leads 3 and Hy3 leads 5 of 8 shared benchmarks. Hy3 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Hy3
Overall
61.1DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
46.2Hy3
RWT
7.0DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
8.0Hy3
HLE
42.7DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
53.2Hy3
GPQA
90.1DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
90.4Hy3
SWE-bench
80.6DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
78.0Hy3
SWE-Pro
55.4DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
57.9Hy3
Terminal-Bench
87.9DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
71.7Hy3
MCP Atlas
73.6DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
79.1Hy3
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Input$0.43
Output$0.87
Workload$0.61
Context1M
Hy3
Input$0.12
Output$0.43
Workload$0.21
Context256K

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Hy3 comparisons

Explore how DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Hy3 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.