Which is better: Gemini 3.5 Flash or GLM-5.2?

Verdict: Gemini 3.5 Flash ranks higher (#100 vs #106); GLM-5.2 wins 4 of 7 shared benchmarks. AskClash compares Gemini 3.5 Flash and GLM-5.2 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

How do Gemini 3.5 Flash and GLM-5.2 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Gemini 3.5 Flash and GLM-5.2 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GLM-5.2: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GLM-5.2 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Gemini 3.5 Flash ranks higher (#100 vs #106); GLM-5.2 wins 4 of 7 shared benchmarks.

Open live leaderboard Gemini 3.5 Flash model page GLM-5.2 model page

Rank #100 vs #106AskClash overall scores 49.5 vs 47.7.

Pricing —/— vs $1.40/$4.40Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Open Weights vs Open WeightGoogle vs Z.AI.

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GLM-5.2 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Gemini 3.5 Flash	GLM-5.2
Overall Score	49.5	47.7
Leaderboard Rank	#100	#106
RWT	7.0	8.5
Coding Agent Index	—	74.4
HLE	42.7	54.7
GPQA	92.2	91.2
IFEval	76.3	73.3
SWE-Pro	—	62.1
SWE-Atlas	—	74.4
DeepSWE	—	43.8
GDPval-AA	1202.6	1372.0
MCP Atlas	—	76.8
Finance Agent	—	49.7
MMMU-Pro	84.3	—
ARC-AGI 2	72.1	22.8
Tau2	95.3	99.1
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	—	$1.40
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	—	$4.40
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	8	13

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GLM-5.2 head-to-head charts

Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 4 and GLM-5.2 leads 4 of 8 shared benchmarks. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Gemini 3.5 FlashGLM-5.2

Overall

49.5Gemini 3.5 Flash

47.7GLM-5.2

RWT

7.0Gemini 3.5 Flash

8.5GLM-5.2

HLE

42.7Gemini 3.5 Flash

54.7GLM-5.2

GPQA

92.2Gemini 3.5 Flash

91.2GLM-5.2

IFEval

76.3Gemini 3.5 Flash

73.3GLM-5.2

GDPval-AA

1202.6Gemini 3.5 Flash

1372.0GLM-5.2

ARC-AGI 2

72.1Gemini 3.5 Flash

22.8GLM-5.2

Tau2

95.3Gemini 3.5 Flash

99.1GLM-5.2

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Input—

Output—

Workload—

Context1M

GLM-5.2

Input$1.40

Output$4.40

Workload$2.28

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Gemini 3.5 Flash and GLM-5.2 comparisons

Explore how Gemini 3.5 Flash and GLM-5.2 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Claude Opus 5.5 vs GLM-5.2 Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM-5.2 Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GLM-5.2 Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Claude Opus 5 vs GLM-5.2 Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Claude Fable 5 vs GLM-5.2

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.