LLM Comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Kimi K2.7: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Kimi K2.7 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Rank #12 vs #21AskClash overall scores 69.1 vs 52.3.
Pricing $1.50/$7.50 vs $0.95/$4.00Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightGoogle vs Moonshot AI.

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Kimi K2.7 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricGemini 3.7 FlashKimi K2.7
Overall Score69.152.3
Leaderboard Rank#12#21
ACB38.943.0
RWT7.5
HLE53.654.0
GPQA94.590.5
SWE-bench80.2
SWE-Pro58.6
Terminal-Bench85.866.7
DeepSWE65.330.5
OSWorld73.1
MCP Atlas76.0
Finance Agent44.9
CharXiv84.580.4
MMMU-Pro85.579.4
Tau290.1
MRCR97.0
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$1.50$0.95
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$7.50$4.00
Context Window1M256K
Benchmarks Published1014

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Kimi K2.7 head-to-head charts

Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 6 and Kimi K2.7 leads 2 of 8 shared benchmarks. Kimi K2.7 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Gemini 3.7 FlashKimi K2.7
Overall
69.1Gemini 3.7 Flash
52.3Kimi K2.7
ACB
38.9Gemini 3.7 Flash
43.0Kimi K2.7
HLE
53.6Gemini 3.7 Flash
54.0Kimi K2.7
GPQA
94.5Gemini 3.7 Flash
90.5Kimi K2.7
Terminal-Bench
85.8Gemini 3.7 Flash
66.7Kimi K2.7
DeepSWE
65.3Gemini 3.7 Flash
30.5Kimi K2.7
CharXiv
84.5Gemini 3.7 Flash
80.4Kimi K2.7
MMMU-Pro
85.5Gemini 3.7 Flash
79.4Kimi K2.7
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Input$1.50
Output$7.50
Workload$3.00
Context1M
Kimi K2.7
Input$0.95
Output$4.00
Workload$1.75
Context256K

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Gemini 3.7 Flash and Kimi K2.7 comparisons

Explore how Gemini 3.7 Flash and Kimi K2.7 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.