LLM Comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.8 27B: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.8 27B comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Gemini 3.7 Flash ranks higher (#28 vs #39) and wins 7 of 9 shared benchmarks; Qwen3.8 27B costs less ($0.45/$3.20 vs $1.50/$7.50 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboardGemini 3.7 Flash model pageQwen3.8 27B model page
Rank #28 vs #39AskClash overall scores 59.1 vs 51.4.
Pricing $1.50/$7.50 vs $0.45/$3.20Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightGoogle vs Alibaba.

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.8 27B benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.8 27B
Overall Score59.151.4
Leaderboard Rank#28#39
ACB38.956.4
HLE53.630.8
GPQA94.589.2
IFEval—79.5
SWE-Pro—61.7
Terminal-Bench85.873.0
DeepSWE65.342.2
GDPval-AA1525.01408.9
OSWorld—84.3
Finance Agent59.048.6
CharXiv84.590.2
MMMU-Pro85.576.3
ARC-AGI 284.6—
MRCR97.0—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$1.50$0.45
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$7.50$3.20
Context Window1M262K
Benchmarks Published1313

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.8 27B head-to-head charts

Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 8 and Qwen3.8 27B leads 2 of 10 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Gemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.8 27B
Overall
59.1Gemini 3.7 Flash
51.4Qwen3.8 27B
ACB
38.9Gemini 3.7 Flash
56.4Qwen3.8 27B
HLE
53.6Gemini 3.7 Flash
30.8Qwen3.8 27B
GPQA
94.5Gemini 3.7 Flash
89.2Qwen3.8 27B
Terminal-Bench
85.8Gemini 3.7 Flash
73.0Qwen3.8 27B
DeepSWE
65.3Gemini 3.7 Flash
42.2Qwen3.8 27B
GDPval-AA
1525.0Gemini 3.7 Flash
1408.9Qwen3.8 27B
Finance Agent
59.0Gemini 3.7 Flash
48.6Qwen3.8 27B
CharXiv
84.5Gemini 3.7 Flash
90.2Qwen3.8 27B
MMMU-Pro
85.5Gemini 3.7 Flash
76.3Qwen3.8 27B
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Input$1.50
Output$7.50
Workload$3.00
Context1M
Qwen3.8 27B
Input$0.45
Output$3.20
Workload$1.09
Context262K

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen3.8 27B comparisons

Explore how Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen3.8 27B stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.7 FlashClaude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 27BClaude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.7 FlashClaude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 27BClaude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.7 FlashClaude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 27BClaude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.7 FlashClaude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 27BGPT-5.6 Sol vs Gemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 27B

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.