LLM Comparison

GLM-5.2 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max): benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side GLM-5.2 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Rank #4 vs #13AskClash overall scores 85.6 vs 59.9.
Pricing $1.40/$4.40 vs $1.74/$3.48Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs Open WeightZ.AI vs DeepSeek.

GLM-5.2 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricGLM-5.2DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)
Overall Score85.659.9
Leaderboard Rank#4#13
RWT9.08.0
Coding Agent Index74.4
HLE54.737.7
GPQA91.290.1
MATH-50064.5
SWE-bench80.6
SWE-Pro62.155.4
SWE-Atlas74.4
Terminal-Bench82.767.9
LiveCodeBench93.5
MCP Atlas76.873.6
Tau299.196.2
MRCR83.5
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$1.40$1.74
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$4.40$3.48
Context Window1M1M
Benchmark Cells910

More GLM-5.2 and DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) comparisons

Explore how GLM-5.2 and DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.