Which is better: GPT-6.1 Sol or Claude Opus 5?

Verdict: GPT-6.1 Sol ranks higher (#7 vs #8) and wins 4 of 7 shared benchmarks; GPT-6.1 Sol costs less ($2.00/$10.0 vs $5.00/$25.0 per 1M tokens). AskClash compares GPT-6.1 Sol and Claude Opus 5 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

How do GPT-6.1 Sol and Claude Opus 5 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both GPT-6.1 Sol and Claude Opus 5 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Opus 5: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Opus 5 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: GPT-6.1 Sol ranks higher (#7 vs #8) and wins 4 of 7 shared benchmarks; GPT-6.1 Sol costs less ($2.00/$10.0 vs $5.00/$25.0 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboard GPT-6.1 Sol model page Claude Opus 5 model page

Rank #7 vs #8AskClash overall scores 69.2 vs 68.8.

Pricing $2.00/$10.0 vs $5.00/$25.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryOpenAI vs Anthropic.

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Opus 5 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	GPT-6.1 Sol	Claude Opus 5
Overall Score	69.2	68.8
Leaderboard Rank	#7	#8
ACB	69.9	70.5
AA Intelligence Index	52.0	50.7
AutomationBench-AA	64.9	—
RWT	—	9.0
Coding Agent Index	54.1	—
HLE	52.9	64.7
GPQA	95.0	—
SWE-bench	—	96.0
SWE-Pro	—	79.2
SWE-Atlas	59.9	—
Terminal-Bench 4.0	56.1	49.0
DeepSWE	75.2	73.6
GDPval-AA	1575.1	1861.0
MCP Atlas	—	85.8
Finance Agent v2.1	61.8	—
MMMU-Pro	86.0	—
ARC-AGI 2	94.2	90.4
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$2.00	$5.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$10.0	$25.0
Context Window	1.05M	1M
Benchmarks Published	14	9

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Opus 5 head-to-head charts

GPT-6.1 Sol leads 4 and Claude Opus 5 leads 3 of 7 shared benchmarks. GPT-6.1 Sol is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

GPT-6.1 SolClaude Opus 5

Overall

69.2GPT-6.1 Sol

68.8Claude Opus 5

ACB

69.9GPT-6.1 Sol

70.5Claude Opus 5

AA Intelligence Index

52.0GPT-6.1 Sol

50.7Claude Opus 5

HLE

52.9GPT-6.1 Sol

64.7Claude Opus 5

Terminal-Bench 4.0

56.1GPT-6.1 Sol

49.0Claude Opus 5

DeepSWE

75.2GPT-6.1 Sol

73.6Claude Opus 5

GDPval-AA

1575.1GPT-6.1 Sol

1861.0Claude Opus 5

ARC-AGI 2

94.2GPT-6.1 Sol

90.4Claude Opus 5

GPT-6.1 Sol

Input$2.00

Output$10.0

Workload$4.00

Context1.05M

Claude Opus 5

Input$5.00

Output$25.0

Workload$10

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More GPT-6.1 Sol and Claude Opus 5 comparisons

Explore how GPT-6.1 Sol and Claude Opus 5 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs GPT-6.1 Sol Claude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Opus 5 Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Opus 5 Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Opus 5 Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5 Gemini 4 Carbon vs GPT-6.1 Sol Gemini 4 Carbon vs Claude Opus 5

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.