Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
GPT-6.1 Sol vs Ling 3.1 Flash: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side GPT-6.1 Sol vs Ling 3.1 Flash comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Verdict: GPT-6.1 Sol ranks higher (#8 vs #25).
Rank #8 vs #25AskClash overall scores 71.0 vs 57.5.
Pricing $2.00/$10.0 vs —/—Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightOpenAI vs InclusionAI.
GPT-6.1 Sol vs Ling 3.1 Flash benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 71.0 | 57.5 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #8 | #25 |
| ACB | 69.9 | — |
| Coding Agent Index | 62.9 | — |
| HLE | 52.9 | 37.4 |
| GPQA | 95.0 | — |
| SWE-Atlas | 61.0 | — |
| Terminal-Bench | 56.1 | — |
| DeepSWE | 75.2 | — |
| GDPval-AA | 1575.1 | 1617.9 |
| MCP Atlas | — | 83.0 |
| Finance Agent | 52.0 | — |
| MMMU-Pro | 86.0 | — |
| ARC-AGI 2 | 94.2 | — |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $2.00 | — |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $10.0 | — |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 262K |
| Benchmarks Published | 14 | 6 |
GPT-6.1 Sol vs Ling 3.1 Flash head-to-head charts
GPT-6.1 Sol leads 2 and Ling 3.1 Flash leads 1 of 3 shared benchmarks. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
GPT-6.1 SolLing 3.1 Flash
Overall
HLE
GDPval-AA
GPT-6.1 Sol
Input$2.00
Output$10.0
Workload$4.00
Context1.05M
Ling 3.1 Flash
Input—
Output—
Workload—
Context262K
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More GPT-6.1 Sol and Ling 3.1 Flash comparisons
Explore how GPT-6.1 Sol and Ling 3.1 Flash stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 SolClaude Opus 5.5 vs Ling 3.1 FlashClaude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 SolClaude Fable 5.1 vs Ling 3.1 FlashClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 SolClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Ling 3.1 FlashClaude Opus 5 vs GPT-6.1 SolClaude Opus 5 vs Ling 3.1 FlashClaude Fable 5 vs GPT-6.1 SolClaude Fable 5 vs Ling 3.1 Flash
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.