Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Haiku 5.5: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Haiku 5.5 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Verdict: Kimi K3.1 Pro ranks higher (#4 vs #42) and wins 4 of 4 shared benchmarks; Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less ($0.10/$0.50 vs $2.00/$10.0 per 1M tokens).
Rank #4 vs #42AskClash overall scores 75.5 vs 59.6.
Pricing $2.00/$10.0 vs $0.10/$0.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs ProprietaryMoonshot AI vs Anthropic.
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Haiku 5.5 benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 75.5 | 59.6 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #4 | #42 |
| ACB | — | 63.5 |
| HLE | 70.0 | 57.4 |
| GPQA | 94.2 | — |
| SWE-Pro | — | 64.8 |
| Terminal-Bench | 65.7 | 32.8 |
| DeepSWE | 75.5 | — |
| GDPval-AA | 1846.0 | 1620.0 |
| Finance Agent | 58.6 | 54.1 |
| CharXiv | 89.0 | — |
| MMMU-Pro | 84.1 | — |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $2.00 | $0.10 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $10.0 | $0.50 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1M |
| Benchmarks Published | 9 | 9 |
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Haiku 5.5 head-to-head charts
Kimi K3.1 Pro leads 5 and Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 0 of 5 shared benchmarks. Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
Kimi K3.1 ProClaude Haiku 5.5
Overall
HLE
Terminal-Bench
GDPval-AA
Finance Agent
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Input$2.00
Output$10.0
Workload$4.00
Context1M
Claude Haiku 5.5
Input$0.10
Output$0.50
Workload$0.20
Context1M
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More Kimi K3.1 Pro and Claude Haiku 5.5 comparisons
Explore how Kimi K3.1 Pro and Claude Haiku 5.5 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K3.1 ProClaude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3.1 ProClaude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Kimi K3.1 ProClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 5Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.