Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniMax-M3: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniMax-M3 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Verdict: Kimi K3.1 Pro ranks higher (#4 vs #119) and wins 5 of 5 shared benchmarks; MiniMax-M3 costs less ($0.30/$1.20 vs $2.00/$10.0 per 1M tokens).
Rank #4 vs #119AskClash overall scores 75.5 vs 38.5.
Pricing $2.00/$10.0 vs $0.30/$1.20Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs Open WeightMoonshot AI vs MiniMax.
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniMax-M3 benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | Kimi K3.1 Pro | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 75.5 | 38.5 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #4 | #119 |
| ACB | — | 29.8 |
| RWT | — | 8.5 |
| HLE | 70.0 | 37.1 |
| GPQA | 94.2 | 92.9 |
| IFEval | — | 82.9 |
| SWE-bench | — | 80.5 |
| SWE-Pro | — | 59.0 |
| Terminal-Bench | 65.7 | — |
| DeepSWE | 75.5 | — |
| GDPval-AA | 1846.0 | 58.4 |
| OSWorld | — | 70.1 |
| MCP Atlas | — | 74.2 |
| Finance Agent | 58.6 | 48.3 |
| CharXiv | 89.0 | — |
| MMMU-Pro | 84.1 | 78.1 |
| Tau2 | — | 88.9 |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $2.00 | $0.30 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $10.0 | $1.20 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1M |
| Benchmarks Published | 9 | 11 |
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniMax-M3 head-to-head charts
Kimi K3.1 Pro leads 6 and MiniMax-M3 leads 0 of 6 shared benchmarks. MiniMax-M3 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
Kimi K3.1 ProMiniMax-M3
Overall
HLE
GPQA
GDPval-AA
Finance Agent
MMMU-Pro
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Input$2.00
Output$10.0
Workload$4.00
Context1M
MiniMax-M3
Input$0.30
Output$1.20
Workload$0.54
Context1M
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More Kimi K3.1 Pro and MiniMax-M3 comparisons
Explore how Kimi K3.1 Pro and MiniMax-M3 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K3.1 ProClaude Opus 5.5 vs MiniMax-M3Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3.1 ProClaude Fable 5.1 vs MiniMax-M3Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Kimi K3.1 ProClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs MiniMax-M3Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 5Claude Opus 5 vs MiniMax-M3Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5 vs MiniMax-M3
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.