How do Kimi K3 and Qwen3.5 397B compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Kimi K3 and Qwen3.5 397B when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5 397B: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: Kimi K3 or Qwen3.5 397B?

AskClash compares Kimi K3 and Qwen3.5 397B side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5 397B comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard Kimi K3 model page Qwen3.5 397B model page

Rank #5 vs #26AskClash overall scores 76.4 vs 50.2.

Pricing $3.00/$15.0 vs $0.60/$3.60Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Open Weight vs Open WeightMoonshot AI vs Alibaba.

Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5 397B benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Kimi K3	Qwen3.5 397B
Overall Score	76.4	50.2
Leaderboard Rank	#5	#26
RWT	8.0	—
HLE	43.5	28.7
GPQA	93.5	88.4
IFEval	—	92.6
SWE-bench	—	76.2
Terminal-Bench	88.3	—
DeepSWE	68.5	—
MCP Atlas	84.2	46.1
Finance Agent	54.4	—
CharXiv	84.8	80.8
MMMU-Pro	81.6	79.0
Tau2	—	95.6
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$3.00	$0.60
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$15.0	$3.60
Context Window	1M	128K
Benchmarks Published	11	8

Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5 397B head-to-head charts

Kimi K3 leads 6 and Qwen3.5 397B leads 0 of 6 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.5 397B is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Kimi K3Qwen3.5 397B

Overall

76.4Kimi K3

50.2Qwen3.5 397B

HLE

43.5Kimi K3

28.7Qwen3.5 397B

GPQA

93.5Kimi K3

88.4Qwen3.5 397B

MCP Atlas

84.2Kimi K3

46.1Qwen3.5 397B

CharXiv

84.8Kimi K3

80.8Qwen3.5 397B

MMMU-Pro

81.6Kimi K3

79.0Qwen3.5 397B

Kimi K3

Input$3.00

Output$15.0

Workload$6.00

Context1M

Qwen3.5 397B

Input$0.60

Output$3.60

Workload$1.32

Context128K

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Kimi K3 and Qwen3.5 397B comparisons

Explore how Kimi K3 and Qwen3.5 397B stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3 Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.5 397B Claude Fable 5 vs Kimi K3 Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.5 397B GPT-5.6 Sol vs Kimi K3 GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.5 397B Claude Opus 4.8 vs Kimi K3 Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3.5 397B Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen3.5 397B

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.