LLM Comparison

Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.5 397B: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.5 397B comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardClaude Fable 5 model pageQwen3.5 397B model page
Rank #2 vs #26AskClash overall scores 92.5 vs 50.2.
Pricing $10.0/$50.0 vs $0.60/$3.60Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightAnthropic vs Alibaba.

Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.5 397B benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricClaude Fable 5Qwen3.5 397B
Overall Score92.550.2
Leaderboard Rank#2#26
RWT9.0—
Coding Agent Index77.2—
HLE64.528.7
GPQA94.588.4
IFEval80.392.6
SWE-bench95.576.2
SWE-Pro80.3—
SWE-Atlas83.3—
Terminal-Bench88.0—
DeepSWE69.7—
OSWorld85.0—
MCP Atlas—46.1
Finance Agent56.3—
CharXiv93.580.8
MMMU-Pro92.779.0
Tau289.295.6
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$10.0$0.60
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$50.0$3.60
Context Window1M+128K
Benchmarks Published178

Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.5 397B head-to-head charts

Claude Fable 5 leads 6 and Qwen3.5 397B leads 2 of 8 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.5 397B is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Fable 5Qwen3.5 397B
Overall
92.5Claude Fable 5
50.2Qwen3.5 397B
HLE
64.5Claude Fable 5
28.7Qwen3.5 397B
GPQA
94.5Claude Fable 5
88.4Qwen3.5 397B
IFEval
80.3Claude Fable 5
92.6Qwen3.5 397B
SWE-bench
95.5Claude Fable 5
76.2Qwen3.5 397B
CharXiv
93.5Claude Fable 5
80.8Qwen3.5 397B
MMMU-Pro
92.7Claude Fable 5
79.0Qwen3.5 397B
Tau2
89.2Claude Fable 5
95.6Qwen3.5 397B
Claude Fable 5
Input$10.0
Output$50.0
Workload$20
Context1M+
Qwen3.5 397B
Input$0.60
Output$3.60
Workload$1.32
Context128K

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Fable 5 and Qwen3.5 397B comparisons

Explore how Claude Fable 5 and Qwen3.5 397B stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.5 397BClaude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 SolGPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.5 397BClaude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3.5 397BClaude Fable 5 vs Kimi K3Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5 397BClaude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen3.5 397B

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.