How do Muse Spark 1.1 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Muse Spark 1.1 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: Muse Spark 1.1 or Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?

AskClash compares Muse Spark 1.1 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side Muse Spark 1.1 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard Muse Spark 1.1 model page Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite model page

Rank #6 vs #61AskClash overall scores 78.2 vs 14.2.

Pricing $1.25/$4.25 vs $0.30/$2.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryMeta vs Google.

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Muse Spark 1.1	Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Overall Score	78.2	14.2
Leaderboard Rank	#6	#61
RWT	7.5	7.0
HLE	62.1	—
SWE-Pro	61.5	54.2
Terminal-Bench	80.0	54.0
OSWorld	80.8	74.0
MCP Atlas	88.1	—
Finance Agent	57.2	—
CharXiv	88.4	—
MRCR	54.1	72.2
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$1.25	$0.30
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$4.25	$2.50
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	9	6

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite head-to-head charts

Muse Spark 1.1 leads 5 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads 1 of 6 shared benchmarks. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Muse Spark 1.1Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Overall

78.2Muse Spark 1.1

14.2Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

RWT

7.5Muse Spark 1.1

7.0Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

SWE-Pro

61.5Muse Spark 1.1

54.2Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Terminal-Bench

80.0Muse Spark 1.1

54.0Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

OSWorld

80.8Muse Spark 1.1

74.0Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

MRCR

54.1Muse Spark 1.1

72.2Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Muse Spark 1.1

Input$1.25

Output$4.25

Workload$2.10

Context1M

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Input$0.30

Output$2.50

Workload$0.80

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Muse Spark 1.1 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite comparisons

Explore how Muse Spark 1.1 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite GPT-5.6 Sol vs Muse Spark 1.1 GPT-5.6 Sol vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Kimi K3 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Kimi K3 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Claude Opus 4.8 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Grok 4.5 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Grok 4.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.