LLM Comparison

Muse Wonder vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Muse Wonder vs Gemini 3.1 Pro comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Muse Wonder ranks higher (#11 vs #46) and wins 3 of 4 shared benchmarks; Gemini 3.1 Pro costs less ($2.00/$12.0 vs $4.00/$20.0 per 1M tokens).

Rank #11 vs #46AskClash overall scores 64.7 vs 40.6.
Pricing $4.00/$20.0 vs $2.00/$12.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryMeta vs Google.

Muse Wonder vs Gemini 3.1 Pro benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricMuse WonderGemini 3.1 Pro
Overall Score64.740.6
Leaderboard Rank#11#46
ACB62.3—
HLE50.151.4
GPQA—94.3
SWE-bench—80.6
SWE-Pro—54.2
Terminal-Bench52.0—
DeepSWE78.811.7
GDPval-AA1770.31317.0
MCP Atlas—69.2
Finance Agent56.643.0
CharXiv—80.2
MMMU-Pro—83.9
ARC-AGI 2—77.1
Tau2—99.3
MRCR—84.9
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$4.00$2.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$20.0$12.0
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published910

Muse Wonder vs Gemini 3.1 Pro head-to-head charts

Muse Wonder leads 4 and Gemini 3.1 Pro leads 1 of 5 shared benchmarks. Gemini 3.1 Pro is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Muse WonderGemini 3.1 Pro
Overall
64.7Muse Wonder
40.6Gemini 3.1 Pro
HLE
50.1Muse Wonder
51.4Gemini 3.1 Pro
DeepSWE
78.8Muse Wonder
11.7Gemini 3.1 Pro
GDPval-AA
1770.3Muse Wonder
1317.0Gemini 3.1 Pro
Finance Agent
56.6Muse Wonder
43.0Gemini 3.1 Pro
Muse Wonder
Input$4.00
Output$20.0
Workload$8.00
Context1M
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Input$2.00
Output$12.0
Workload$4.40
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Muse Wonder and Gemini 3.1 Pro comparisons

Explore how Muse Wonder and Gemini 3.1 Pro stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.