LLM Comparison

Qwen3.7 Plus vs Hy3: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Qwen3.7 Plus vs Hy3 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Rank #29 vs #32AskClash overall scores 56.2 vs 55.6.
Pricing $0.40/$1.60 vs $0.12/$0.43Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightAlibaba vs Tencent.

Qwen3.7 Plus vs Hy3 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricQwen3.7 PlusHy3
Overall Score56.255.6
Leaderboard Rank#29#32
RWT7.58.0
HLE34.753.2
GPQA90.390.4
IFEval94.6
SWE-bench77.778.0
SWE-Pro57.657.9
Terminal-Bench70.371.7
GDPval-AA1522.11136.0
OSWorld73.3
MCP Atlas73.279.1
Finance Agent38.2
CharXiv85.9
MMMU-Pro79.0
Tau293.092.7
MRCR91.775.1
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$0.40$0.12
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$1.60$0.43
Context Window1M256K
Benchmarks Published1510

Qwen3.7 Plus vs Hy3 head-to-head charts

Qwen3.7 Plus leads 4 and Hy3 leads 7 of 11 shared benchmarks. Hy3 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.7 PlusHy3
Overall
56.2Qwen3.7 Plus
55.6Hy3
RWT
7.5Qwen3.7 Plus
8.0Hy3
HLE
34.7Qwen3.7 Plus
53.2Hy3
GPQA
90.3Qwen3.7 Plus
90.4Hy3
SWE-bench
77.7Qwen3.7 Plus
78.0Hy3
SWE-Pro
57.6Qwen3.7 Plus
57.9Hy3
Terminal-Bench
70.3Qwen3.7 Plus
71.7Hy3
GDPval-AA
1522.1Qwen3.7 Plus
1136.0Hy3
MCP Atlas
73.2Qwen3.7 Plus
79.1Hy3
Tau2
93.0Qwen3.7 Plus
92.7Hy3
MRCR
91.7Qwen3.7 Plus
75.1Hy3
Qwen3.7 Plus
Input$0.40
Output$1.60
Workload$0.72
Context1M
Hy3
Input$0.12
Output$0.43
Workload$0.21
Context256K

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.7 Plus and Hy3 comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.7 Plus and Hy3 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.