LLM Comparison

Qwen3.8 27B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Qwen3.8 27B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Qwen3.8 27B ranks higher (#39 vs #58) and wins 7 of 8 shared benchmarks; Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite costs less ($0.30/$2.50 vs $0.45/$3.20 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboardQwen3.8 27B model pageGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite model page
Rank #39 vs #58AskClash overall scores 51.4 vs 31.8.
Pricing $0.45/$3.20 vs $0.30/$2.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs ProprietaryAlibaba vs Google.

Qwen3.8 27B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricQwen3.8 27BGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Overall Score51.431.8
Leaderboard Rank#39#58
ACB56.4—
RWT—7.0
HLE30.818.8
GPQA89.283.8
IFEval79.5—
SWE-Pro61.754.2
Terminal-Bench73.054.0
DeepSWE42.2—
GDPval-AA1408.91140.0
OSWorld84.374.0
Finance Agent48.647.4
CharXiv90.2—
MMMU-Pro76.379.0
MRCR—72.2
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$0.45$0.30
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$3.20$2.50
Context Window262K1M
Benchmarks Published1310

Qwen3.8 27B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite head-to-head charts

Qwen3.8 27B leads 8 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads 1 of 9 shared benchmarks. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.8 27BGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Overall
51.4Qwen3.8 27B
31.8Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
HLE
30.8Qwen3.8 27B
18.8Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
GPQA
89.2Qwen3.8 27B
83.8Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
SWE-Pro
61.7Qwen3.8 27B
54.2Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Terminal-Bench
73.0Qwen3.8 27B
54.0Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
GDPval-AA
1408.9Qwen3.8 27B
1140.0Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
OSWorld
84.3Qwen3.8 27B
74.0Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Finance Agent
48.6Qwen3.8 27B
47.4Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
MMMU-Pro
76.3Qwen3.8 27B
79.0Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Qwen3.8 27B
Input$0.45
Output$3.20
Workload$1.09
Context262K
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Input$0.30
Output$2.50
Workload$0.80
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.8 27B and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.8 27B and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 27BClaude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteClaude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 27BClaude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteClaude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 27BClaude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteClaude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 27BClaude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 27BGPT-5.6 Sol vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.