LLM Comparison

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Claude Opus 4.8: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Claude Opus 4.8 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardQwen3.8 Max 0902 model pageClaude Opus 4.8 model page
Rank #9 vs #10AskClash overall scores 70.0 vs 69.0.
Pricing $2.00/$6.00 vs $5.00/$25.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryAlibaba vs Anthropic.

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Claude Opus 4.8 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricQwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Opus 4.8
Overall Score70.069.0
Leaderboard Rank#9#10
ACB59.060.1
RWT—9.0
Coding Agent Index—72.5
HLE43.657.9
GPQA92.693.6
IFEval82.862.2
SWE-bench—88.6
SWE-Pro67.769.2
SWE-Atlas66.382.5
Terminal-Bench86.674.6
DeepSWE69.359.0
GDPval-AA—1889.8
OSWorld86.183.4
MCP Atlas—82.2
Finance Agent—53.9
CharXiv88.489.9
MMMU-Pro82.7—
ARC-AGI 2—72.1
Tau2—94.4
MRCR92.9—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$2.00$5.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$6.00$25.0
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published1218

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Claude Opus 4.8 head-to-head charts

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 leads 5 and Claude Opus 4.8 leads 6 of 11 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Max 0902 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Opus 4.8
Overall
70.0Qwen3.8 Max 0902
69.0Claude Opus 4.8
ACB
59.0Qwen3.8 Max 0902
60.1Claude Opus 4.8
HLE
43.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902
57.9Claude Opus 4.8
GPQA
92.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902
93.6Claude Opus 4.8
IFEval
82.8Qwen3.8 Max 0902
62.2Claude Opus 4.8
SWE-Pro
67.7Qwen3.8 Max 0902
69.2Claude Opus 4.8
SWE-Atlas
66.3Qwen3.8 Max 0902
82.5Claude Opus 4.8
Terminal-Bench
86.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902
74.6Claude Opus 4.8
DeepSWE
69.3Qwen3.8 Max 0902
59.0Claude Opus 4.8
OSWorld
86.1Qwen3.8 Max 0902
83.4Claude Opus 4.8
CharXiv
88.4Qwen3.8 Max 0902
89.9Claude Opus 4.8
Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Input$2.00
Output$6.00
Workload$3.20
Context1M
Claude Opus 4.8
Input$5.00
Output$25.0
Workload$10
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.8 Max 0902 and Claude Opus 4.8 comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.8 Max 0902 and Claude Opus 4.8 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902GLM-5.3 vs Claude Opus 4.8Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Grok 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.8

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.