LLM Comparison

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Grok 4.5: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Grok 4.5 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Rank #9 vs #17AskClash overall scores 70.0 vs 61.4.
Pricing $2.00/$6.00 vs $2.00/$6.00Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryAlibaba vs xAI.

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Grok 4.5 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricQwen3.8 Max 0902Grok 4.5
Overall Score70.061.4
Leaderboard Rank#9#17
ACB59.057.6
RWT9.0
Coding Agent Index76.4
HLE43.640.3
GPQA92.693.1
IFEval82.8
SWE-Pro67.764.7
SWE-Atlas66.383.9
Terminal-Bench86.683.3
DeepSWE69.3
GDPval-AA1542.8
OSWorld86.1
Finance Agent48.3
CharXiv88.4
MMMU-Pro82.780.4
ARC-AGI 252.6
MRCR92.9
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$2.00$2.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$6.00$6.00
Context Window1M500K
Benchmarks Published1212

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Grok 4.5 head-to-head charts

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 leads 6 and Grok 4.5 leads 2 of 8 shared benchmarks. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.8 Max 0902Grok 4.5
Overall
70.0Qwen3.8 Max 0902
61.4Grok 4.5
ACB
59.0Qwen3.8 Max 0902
57.6Grok 4.5
HLE
43.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902
40.3Grok 4.5
GPQA
92.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902
93.1Grok 4.5
SWE-Pro
67.7Qwen3.8 Max 0902
64.7Grok 4.5
SWE-Atlas
66.3Qwen3.8 Max 0902
83.9Grok 4.5
Terminal-Bench
86.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902
83.3Grok 4.5
MMMU-Pro
82.7Qwen3.8 Max 0902
80.4Grok 4.5
Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Input$2.00
Output$6.00
Workload$3.20
Context1M
Grok 4.5
Input$2.00
Output$6.00
Workload$3.20
Context500K

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.8 Max 0902 and Grok 4.5 comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.8 Max 0902 and Grok 4.5 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.