How do Qwen3.8 Max and Inkling-Small compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Qwen3.8 Max and Inkling-Small when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Qwen3.8 Max vs Inkling-Small: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: Qwen3.8 Max or Inkling-Small?

AskClash compares Qwen3.8 Max and Inkling-Small side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side Qwen3.8 Max vs Inkling-Small comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard Qwen3.8 Max model page Inkling-Small model page

Rank #7 vs #30AskClash overall scores 71.5 vs 36.6.

Pricing $2.00/$6.00 vs $0.58/$1.44Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Open Weight vs Open WeightAlibaba vs Thinking Machines Lab.

Qwen3.8 Max vs Inkling-Small benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Qwen3.8 Max	Inkling-Small
Overall Score	71.5	36.6
Leaderboard Rank	#7	#30
ACB	59.0	—
HLE	43.6	47.8
GPQA	92.6	89.5
IFEval	82.8	82.2
SWE-bench	—	80.2
SWE-Pro	67.7	—
Terminal-Bench	86.6	64.7
DeepSWE	56.6	—
OSWorld	86.1	—
MCP Atlas	—	79.6
Finance Agent	50.6	41.3
CharXiv	88.4	81.3
MMMU-Pro	82.3	74.0
ARC-AGI 2	—	40.1
MRCR	92.9	—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$2.00	$0.58
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$6.00	$1.44
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	13	10

Qwen3.8 Max vs Inkling-Small head-to-head charts

Qwen3.8 Max leads 7 and Inkling-Small leads 1 of 8 shared benchmarks. Inkling-Small is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.8 MaxInkling-Small

Overall

71.5Qwen3.8 Max

36.6Inkling-Small

HLE

43.6Qwen3.8 Max

47.8Inkling-Small

GPQA

92.6Qwen3.8 Max

89.5Inkling-Small

IFEval

82.8Qwen3.8 Max

82.2Inkling-Small

Terminal-Bench

86.6Qwen3.8 Max

64.7Inkling-Small

Finance Agent

50.6Qwen3.8 Max

41.3Inkling-Small

CharXiv

88.4Qwen3.8 Max

81.3Inkling-Small

MMMU-Pro

82.3Qwen3.8 Max

74.0Inkling-Small

Qwen3.8 Max

Input$2.00

Output$6.00

Workload$3.20

Context1M

Inkling-Small

Input$0.58

Output$1.44

Workload$0.87

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.8 Max and Inkling-Small comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.8 Max and Inkling-Small stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max Claude Opus 5 vs Inkling-Small Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max Claude Fable 5 vs Inkling-Small GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max GLM-5.3 vs Inkling-Small Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max Grok 4.6 vs Inkling-Small GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max GPT-5.6 Sol vs Inkling-Small

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.