Which is better: SWE-1.7 or Hy3?

AskClash compares SWE-1.7 and Hy3 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

How do SWE-1.7 and Hy3 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both SWE-1.7 and Hy3 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

SWE-1.7 vs Hy3: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side SWE-1.7 vs Hy3 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard SWE-1.7 model page Hy3 model page

Rank #35 vs #38AskClash overall scores 30.7 vs 26.7.

Pricing $0/$0 vs $0.12/$0.43Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs Open WeightCognition vs Tencent.

SWE-1.7 vs Hy3 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	SWE-1.7	Hy3
Overall Score	30.7	26.7
Leaderboard Rank	#35	#38
RWT	8.5	8.0
HLE	—	53.2
GPQA	—	90.4
SWE-bench	—	78.0
SWE-Pro	—	57.9
Terminal-Bench	81.5	71.7
MCP Atlas	—	79.1
Tau2	—	92.7
MRCR	—	75.1
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$0	$0.12
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$0	$0.43
Context Window	256K	256K
Benchmarks Published	1	9

SWE-1.7 vs Hy3 head-to-head charts

SWE-1.7 leads 3 and Hy3 leads 0 of 3 shared benchmarks. SWE-1.7 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

SWE-1.7Hy3

Overall

30.7SWE-1.7

26.7Hy3

RWT

8.5SWE-1.7

8.0Hy3

Terminal-Bench

81.5SWE-1.7

71.7Hy3

SWE-1.7

Input$0

Output$0

Workload$0.00

Context256K

Hy3

Input$0.12

Output$0.43

Workload$0.21

Context256K

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More SWE-1.7 and Hy3 comparisons

Explore how SWE-1.7 and Hy3 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs SWE-1.7 Claude Fable 5.1 vs Hy3 Claude Fable 5 vs SWE-1.7 Claude Fable 5 vs Hy3 GPT-5.6 Sol vs SWE-1.7 GPT-5.6 Sol vs Hy3 Claude Opus 5 vs SWE-1.7 Claude Opus 5 vs Hy3 Grok 4.6 vs SWE-1.7 Grok 4.6 vs Hy3

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.