How do Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3.7 Plus compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3.7 Plus when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: Claude Opus 5 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

AskClash compares Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3.7 Plus side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard Claude Opus 5 model page Qwen3.7 Plus model page

Rank #1 vs #20AskClash overall scores 94.2 vs 55.8.

Pricing $5.00/$25.0 vs $0.40/$1.60Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryAnthropic vs Alibaba.

Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Claude Opus 5	Qwen3.7 Plus
Overall Score	94.2	55.8
Leaderboard Rank	#1	#20
RWT	9.0	7.5
HLE	64.7	34.7
GPQA	—	90.3
IFEval	—	94.6
SWE-bench	96.0	77.7
SWE-Pro	79.2	57.6
Terminal-Bench	—	70.3
DeepSWE	68.8	—
OSWorld	—	73.3
MCP Atlas	85.8	73.2
Finance Agent	—	38.2
CharXiv	—	85.9
MMMU-Pro	—	79.0
ARC-AGI 2	90.4	—
Tau2	—	93.0
MRCR	—	91.7
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$5.00	$0.40
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$25.0	$1.60
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	8	15

Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus head-to-head charts

Claude Opus 5 leads 6 and Qwen3.7 Plus leads 0 of 6 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Opus 5Qwen3.7 Plus

Overall

94.2Claude Opus 5

55.8Qwen3.7 Plus

RWT

9.0Claude Opus 5

7.5Qwen3.7 Plus

HLE

64.7Claude Opus 5

34.7Qwen3.7 Plus

SWE-bench

96.0Claude Opus 5

77.7Qwen3.7 Plus

SWE-Pro

79.2Claude Opus 5

57.6Qwen3.7 Plus

MCP Atlas

85.8Claude Opus 5

73.2Qwen3.7 Plus

Claude Opus 5

Input$5.00

Output$25.0

Workload$10

Context1M

Qwen3.7 Plus

Input$0.40

Output$1.60

Workload$0.72

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3.7 Plus comparisons

Explore how Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3.7 Plus stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Fable 5 Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.7 Plus Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3.7 Plus Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen3.7 Plus Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3 Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.