LLM Comparison

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardClaude Sonnet 5 model pageQwen3.8 Max 0902 model page
Rank #14 vs #27AskClash overall scores 59.0 vs 39.0.
Pricing $3.00/$15.0 vs $2.00/$6.00Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryAnthropic vs Alibaba.

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricClaude Sonnet 5Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Overall Score59.039.0
Leaderboard Rank#14#27
ACB60.8—
RWT8.5—
HLE57.443.6
GPQA91.192.6
IFEval—82.8
SWE-bench85.2—
SWE-Pro63.267.7
SWE-Atlas—66.3
Terminal-Bench80.486.6
DeepSWE53.869.3
GDPval-AA1618.0—
OSWorld81.286.1
CharXiv88.388.4
MMMU-Pro77.382.7
MRCR—92.9
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$3.00$2.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$15.0$6.00
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published1211

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 head-to-head charts

Claude Sonnet 5 leads 2 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 leads 7 of 9 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Max 0902 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Sonnet 5Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Overall
59.0Claude Sonnet 5
39.0Qwen3.8 Max 0902
HLE
57.4Claude Sonnet 5
43.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902
GPQA
91.1Claude Sonnet 5
92.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902
SWE-Pro
63.2Claude Sonnet 5
67.7Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Terminal-Bench
80.4Claude Sonnet 5
86.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902
DeepSWE
53.8Claude Sonnet 5
69.3Qwen3.8 Max 0902
OSWorld
81.2Claude Sonnet 5
86.1Qwen3.8 Max 0902
CharXiv
88.3Claude Sonnet 5
88.4Qwen3.8 Max 0902
MMMU-Pro
77.3Claude Sonnet 5
82.7Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Claude Sonnet 5
Input$3.00
Output$15.0
Workload$6.00
Context1M
Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Input$2.00
Output$6.00
Workload$3.20
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 comparisons

Explore how Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Sonnet 5GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Grok 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 5Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.