How do Composer 2.5 and Qwen3.7 Plus compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Composer 2.5 and Qwen3.7 Plus when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Composer 2.5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: Composer 2.5 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

AskClash compares Composer 2.5 and Qwen3.7 Plus side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side Composer 2.5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard Composer 2.5 model page Qwen3.7 Plus model page

Rank #14 vs #21AskClash overall scores 67.0 vs 55.7.

Pricing $0.50/$2.50 vs $0.40/$1.60Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryCursor vs Alibaba.

Composer 2.5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Composer 2.5	Qwen3.7 Plus
Overall Score	67.0	55.7
Leaderboard Rank	#14	#21
RWT	8.5	7.5
Coding Agent Index	51.8	—
HLE	—	34.7
GPQA	—	90.3
IFEval	—	94.6
SWE-bench	—	77.7
SWE-Pro	47.0	57.6
SWE-Atlas	72.0	—
Terminal-Bench	69.3	70.3
OSWorld	—	73.3
MCP Atlas	—	73.2
Finance Agent	—	38.2
CharXiv	—	85.9
MMMU-Pro	—	79.0
Tau2	—	93.0
MRCR	—	91.7
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$0.50	$0.40
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$2.50	$1.60
Context Window	200K	1M
Benchmarks Published	4	15

Composer 2.5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus head-to-head charts

Composer 2.5 leads 2 and Qwen3.7 Plus leads 2 of 4 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Composer 2.5Qwen3.7 Plus

Overall

67.0Composer 2.5

55.7Qwen3.7 Plus

RWT

8.5Composer 2.5

7.5Qwen3.7 Plus

SWE-Pro

47.0Composer 2.5

57.6Qwen3.7 Plus

Terminal-Bench

69.3Composer 2.5

70.3Qwen3.7 Plus

Composer 2.5

Input$0.50

Output$2.50

Workload$1.00

Context200K

Qwen3.7 Plus

Input$0.40

Output$1.60

Workload$0.72

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Composer 2.5 and Qwen3.7 Plus comparisons

Explore how Composer 2.5 and Qwen3.7 Plus stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5 vs Composer 2.5 Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus GPT-5.6 Sol vs Composer 2.5 GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.7 Plus Kimi K3 vs Composer 2.5 Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.7 Plus Claude Opus 4.8 vs Composer 2.5 Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3.7 Plus Grok 4.5 vs Composer 2.5 Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.