How do DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Qwen3.8 Max 0902?

AskClash compares DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp model page Qwen3.8 Max 0902 model page

Rank #19 vs #27AskClash overall scores 54.8 vs 39.0.

Pricing $0.14/$0.28 vs $2.00/$6.00Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

API vs ProprietaryDeepSeek vs Alibaba.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp	Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Overall Score	54.8	39.0
Leaderboard Rank	#19	#27
ACB	58.6	—
HLE	—	43.6
GPQA	—	92.6
IFEval	—	82.8
SWE-Pro	—	67.7
SWE-Atlas	—	66.3
Terminal-Bench	83.9	86.6
DeepSWE	59.3	69.3
OSWorld	—	86.1
CharXiv	—	88.4
MMMU-Pro	—	82.7
MRCR	—	92.9
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$0.14	$2.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$0.28	$6.00
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	3	11

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 head-to-head charts

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp leads 1 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 leads 2 of 3 shared benchmarks. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpQwen3.8 Max 0902

Overall

54.8DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

39.0Qwen3.8 Max 0902

Terminal-Bench

83.9DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

86.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902

DeepSWE

59.3DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

69.3Qwen3.8 Max 0902

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

Input$0.14

Output$0.28

Workload$0.20

Context1M

Qwen3.8 Max 0902

Input$2.00

Output$6.00

Workload$3.20

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 comparisons

Explore how DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 GPT-5.6 Sol vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 Claude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 Grok 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.