LLM Comparison

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardGemini 3.6 Flash model pageQwen3.8 Max 0902 model page
Rank #26 vs #27AskClash overall scores 44.0 vs 39.0.
Pricing $1.50/$7.50 vs $2.00/$6.00Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryGoogle vs Alibaba.

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricGemini 3.6 FlashQwen3.8 Max 0902
Overall Score44.039.0
Leaderboard Rank#26#27
ACB33.8—
HLE38.043.6
GPQA92.892.6
IFEval—82.8
SWE-Pro58.767.7
SWE-Atlas—66.3
Terminal-Bench78.086.6
DeepSWE46.769.3
GDPval-AA1421.0—
OSWorld83.086.1
Finance Agent56.3—
CharXiv85.288.4
MMMU-Pro83.282.7
MRCR91.892.9
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$1.50$2.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$7.50$6.00
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published1311

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 head-to-head charts

Gemini 3.6 Flash leads 3 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 leads 7 of 10 shared benchmarks. Gemini 3.6 Flash is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Gemini 3.6 FlashQwen3.8 Max 0902
Overall
44.0Gemini 3.6 Flash
39.0Qwen3.8 Max 0902
HLE
38.0Gemini 3.6 Flash
43.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902
GPQA
92.8Gemini 3.6 Flash
92.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902
SWE-Pro
58.7Gemini 3.6 Flash
67.7Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Terminal-Bench
78.0Gemini 3.6 Flash
86.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902
DeepSWE
46.7Gemini 3.6 Flash
69.3Qwen3.8 Max 0902
OSWorld
83.0Gemini 3.6 Flash
86.1Qwen3.8 Max 0902
CharXiv
85.2Gemini 3.6 Flash
88.4Qwen3.8 Max 0902
MMMU-Pro
83.2Gemini 3.6 Flash
82.7Qwen3.8 Max 0902
MRCR
91.8Gemini 3.6 Flash
92.9Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Input$1.50
Output$7.50
Workload$3.00
Context1M
Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Input$2.00
Output$6.00
Workload$3.20
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Gemini 3.6 Flash and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 comparisons

Explore how Gemini 3.6 Flash and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.6 FlashClaude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.6 FlashClaude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902GPT-5.6 Sol vs Gemini 3.6 FlashGPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.6 FlashClaude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Grok 4.6 vs Gemini 3.6 FlashGrok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.