How do GPT-5.6 Sol and Qwen3.7 Plus compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both GPT-5.6 Sol and Qwen3.7 Plus when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.7 Plus: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: GPT-5.6 Sol or Qwen3.7 Plus?

AskClash compares GPT-5.6 Sol and Qwen3.7 Plus side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.7 Plus comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard GPT-5.6 Sol model page Qwen3.7 Plus model page

Rank #2 vs #21AskClash overall scores 85.6 vs 55.7.

Pricing $5.00/$30.0 vs $0.40/$1.60Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryOpenAI vs Alibaba.

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.7 Plus benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	GPT-5.6 Sol	Qwen3.7 Plus
Overall Score	85.6	55.7
Leaderboard Rank	#2	#21
RWT	9.5	7.5
Coding Agent Index	80.0	—
HLE	47.2	34.7
GPQA	94.1	90.3
IFEval	—	94.6
SWE-bench	—	77.7
SWE-Pro	64.6	57.6
SWE-Atlas	84.0	—
Terminal-Bench	88.8	70.3
DeepSWE	72.7	—
OSWorld	—	73.3
MCP Atlas	—	73.2
Finance Agent	53.8	38.2
CharXiv	—	85.9
MMMU-Pro	83.0	79.0
ARC-AGI 2	92.5	—
Tau2	85.1	93.0
MRCR	91.5	91.7
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$5.00	$0.40
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$30.0	$1.60
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	14	15

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.7 Plus head-to-head charts

GPT-5.6 Sol leads 8 and Qwen3.7 Plus leads 2 of 10 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

GPT-5.6 SolQwen3.7 Plus

Overall

85.6GPT-5.6 Sol

55.7Qwen3.7 Plus

RWT

9.5GPT-5.6 Sol

7.5Qwen3.7 Plus

HLE

47.2GPT-5.6 Sol

34.7Qwen3.7 Plus

GPQA

94.1GPT-5.6 Sol

90.3Qwen3.7 Plus

SWE-Pro

64.6GPT-5.6 Sol

57.6Qwen3.7 Plus

Terminal-Bench

88.8GPT-5.6 Sol

70.3Qwen3.7 Plus

Finance Agent

53.8GPT-5.6 Sol

38.2Qwen3.7 Plus

MMMU-Pro

83.0GPT-5.6 Sol

79.0Qwen3.7 Plus

Tau2

85.1GPT-5.6 Sol

93.0Qwen3.7 Plus

MRCR

91.5GPT-5.6 Sol

91.7Qwen3.7 Plus

GPT-5.6 Sol

Input$5.00

Output$30.0

Workload$11

Context1M

Qwen3.7 Plus

Input$0.40

Output$1.60

Workload$0.72

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More GPT-5.6 Sol and Qwen3.7 Plus comparisons

Explore how GPT-5.6 Sol and Qwen3.7 Plus stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus GPT-5.6 Sol vs Kimi K3 Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.7 Plus GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3.7 Plus GPT-5.6 Sol vs Grok 4.5 Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus GPT-5.6 Sol vs Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.