Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3.7 Plus: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3.7 Plus comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Verdict: GPT-6 Luna ranks higher (#41 vs #51) and wins 3 of 4 shared benchmarks; GPT-6 Luna costs less ($0.10/$0.50 vs $0.40/$1.60 per 1M tokens).
Rank #41 vs #51AskClash overall scores 42.2 vs 28.5.
Pricing $0.10/$0.50 vs $0.40/$1.60Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryOpenAI vs Alibaba.
GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3.7 Plus benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 42.2 | 28.5 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #41 | #51 |
| ACB | 50.2 | — |
| RWT | — | 7.5 |
| HLE | 38.5 | 34.7 |
| GPQA | — | 90.3 |
| IFEval | — | 94.6 |
| SWE-bench | — | 77.7 |
| SWE-Pro | — | 57.6 |
| DeepSWE | 66.6 | — |
| GDPval-AA | 1444.5 | 1522.1 |
| OSWorld | — | 73.3 |
| MCP Atlas | — | 73.2 |
| Finance Agent | 49.9 | 38.2 |
| CharXiv | — | 85.9 |
| MMMU-Pro | 79.7 | 79.0 |
| ARC-AGI 2 | 59.3 | — |
| Tau2 | — | 93.0 |
| MRCR | — | 91.7 |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.10 | $0.40 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.50 | $1.60 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Benchmarks Published | 10 | 9 |
GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3.7 Plus head-to-head charts
GPT-6 Luna leads 4 and Qwen3.7 Plus leads 1 of 5 shared benchmarks. GPT-6 Luna is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
GPT-6 LunaQwen3.7 Plus
Overall
HLE
GDPval-AA
Finance Agent
MMMU-Pro
GPT-6 Luna
Input$0.10
Output$0.50
Workload$0.20
Context1.05M
Qwen3.7 Plus
Input$0.40
Output$1.60
Workload$0.72
Context1M
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More GPT-6 Luna and Qwen3.7 Plus comparisons
Explore how GPT-6 Luna and Qwen3.7 Plus stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 LunaClaude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.7 PlusClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6 LunaClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.7 PlusClaude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 LunaClaude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.7 PlusClaude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 LunaClaude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.7 PlusClaude Fable 5 vs GPT-6 LunaClaude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.