Which is better: Kimi K3.1 Pro or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Verdict: Kimi K3.1 Pro ranks higher (#4 vs #122) and wins 6 of 6 shared benchmarks; Qwen3.7 Plus costs less ($0.40/$1.60 vs $2.00/$10.0 per 1M tokens). AskClash compares Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3.7 Plus side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

How do Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3.7 Plus compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3.7 Plus when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Plus: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Plus comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Kimi K3.1 Pro ranks higher (#4 vs #122) and wins 6 of 6 shared benchmarks; Qwen3.7 Plus costs less ($0.40/$1.60 vs $2.00/$10.0 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboard Kimi K3.1 Pro model page Qwen3.7 Plus model page

Rank #4 vs #122AskClash overall scores 75.5 vs 36.8.

Pricing $2.00/$10.0 vs $0.40/$1.60Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Open Weight vs ProprietaryMoonshot AI vs Alibaba.

Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Plus benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Kimi K3.1 Pro	Qwen3.7 Plus
Overall Score	75.5	36.8
Leaderboard Rank	#4	#122
RWT	—	7.5
HLE	70.0	34.7
GPQA	94.2	90.3
IFEval	—	94.6
SWE-bench	—	77.7
SWE-Pro	—	57.6
Terminal-Bench	65.7	—
DeepSWE	75.5	—
GDPval-AA	1846.0	1522.1
OSWorld	—	73.3
MCP Atlas	—	73.2
Finance Agent	58.6	38.2
CharXiv	89.0	85.9
MMMU-Pro	84.1	79.0
Tau2	—	93.0
MRCR	—	91.7
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$2.00	$0.40
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$10.0	$1.60
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	9	11

Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Plus head-to-head charts

Kimi K3.1 Pro leads 7 and Qwen3.7 Plus leads 0 of 7 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Kimi K3.1 ProQwen3.7 Plus

Overall

75.5Kimi K3.1 Pro

36.8Qwen3.7 Plus

HLE

70.0Kimi K3.1 Pro

34.7Qwen3.7 Plus

GPQA

94.2Kimi K3.1 Pro

90.3Qwen3.7 Plus

GDPval-AA

1846.0Kimi K3.1 Pro

1522.1Qwen3.7 Plus

Finance Agent

58.6Kimi K3.1 Pro

38.2Qwen3.7 Plus

CharXiv

89.0Kimi K3.1 Pro

85.9Qwen3.7 Plus

MMMU-Pro

84.1Kimi K3.1 Pro

79.0Qwen3.7 Plus

Kimi K3.1 Pro

Input$2.00

Output$10.0

Workload$4.00

Context1M

Qwen3.7 Plus

Input$0.40

Output$1.60

Workload$0.72

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3.7 Plus comparisons

Explore how Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3.7 Plus stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.7 Plus Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 5 Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Fable 5 Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.