How do Kimi K3 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Kimi K3 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: Kimi K3 or Qwen3.8 Max 0902?

AskClash compares Kimi K3 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard Kimi K3 model page Qwen3.8 Max 0902 model page

Rank #7 vs #9AskClash overall scores 72.7 vs 70.0.

Pricing $3.00/$15.0 vs $2.00/$6.00Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Open Weight vs ProprietaryMoonshot AI vs Alibaba.

Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Kimi K3	Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Overall Score	72.7	70.0
Leaderboard Rank	#7	#9
ACB	57.7	59.0
RWT	8.0	—
HLE	43.5	43.6
GPQA	93.5	92.6
IFEval	—	82.8
SWE-Pro	—	67.7
SWE-Atlas	—	66.3
Terminal-Bench	88.3	86.6
DeepSWE	68.5	69.3
GDPval-AA	1668.0	—
OSWorld	—	86.1
MCP Atlas	84.2	—
Finance Agent	54.4	—
CharXiv	84.8	88.4
MMMU-Pro	81.6	82.7
MRCR	—	92.9
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$3.00	$2.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$15.0	$6.00
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	11	12

Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 head-to-head charts

Kimi K3 leads 3 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 leads 5 of 8 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Max 0902 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Kimi K3Qwen3.8 Max 0902

Overall

72.7Kimi K3

70.0Qwen3.8 Max 0902

ACB

57.7Kimi K3

59.0Qwen3.8 Max 0902

HLE

43.5Kimi K3

43.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902

GPQA

93.5Kimi K3

92.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902

Terminal-Bench

88.3Kimi K3

86.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902

DeepSWE

68.5Kimi K3

69.3Qwen3.8 Max 0902

CharXiv

84.8Kimi K3

88.4Qwen3.8 Max 0902

MMMU-Pro

81.6Kimi K3

82.7Qwen3.8 Max 0902

Kimi K3

Input$3.00

Output$15.0

Workload$6.00

Context1M

Qwen3.8 Max 0902

Input$2.00

Output$6.00

Workload$3.20

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Kimi K3 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 comparisons

Explore how Kimi K3 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3 Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 Claude Fable 5 vs Kimi K3 Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K3 GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 Grok 4.6 vs Kimi K3 Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.