How do MiniMax-M3 and Qwen3.7 Plus compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both MiniMax-M3 and Qwen3.7 Plus when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

MiniMax-M3 vs Qwen3.7 Plus: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: MiniMax-M3 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

AskClash compares MiniMax-M3 and Qwen3.7 Plus side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side MiniMax-M3 vs Qwen3.7 Plus comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard MiniMax-M3 model page Qwen3.7 Plus model page

Rank #17 vs #21AskClash overall scores 59.4 vs 55.7.

Pricing $0.30/$1.20 vs $0.40/$1.60Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Open Weight vs ProprietaryMiniMax vs Alibaba.

MiniMax-M3 vs Qwen3.7 Plus benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	MiniMax-M3	Qwen3.7 Plus
Overall Score	59.4	55.7
Leaderboard Rank	#17	#21
RWT	8.5	7.5
HLE	37.1	34.7
GPQA	92.9	90.3
IFEval	82.9	94.6
SWE-bench	80.5	77.7
SWE-Pro	59.0	57.6
Terminal-Bench	66.0	70.3
OSWorld	70.1	73.3
MCP Atlas	74.2	73.2
Finance Agent	48.3	38.2
CharXiv	—	85.9
MMMU-Pro	78.1	79.0
Tau2	88.9	93.0
MRCR	—	91.7
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$0.30	$0.40
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$1.20	$1.60
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	13	15

MiniMax-M3 vs Qwen3.7 Plus head-to-head charts

MiniMax-M3 leads 8 and Qwen3.7 Plus leads 5 of 13 shared benchmarks. MiniMax-M3 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

MiniMax-M3Qwen3.7 Plus

Overall

59.4MiniMax-M3

55.7Qwen3.7 Plus

RWT

8.5MiniMax-M3

7.5Qwen3.7 Plus

HLE

37.1MiniMax-M3

34.7Qwen3.7 Plus

GPQA

92.9MiniMax-M3

90.3Qwen3.7 Plus

IFEval

82.9MiniMax-M3

94.6Qwen3.7 Plus

SWE-bench

80.5MiniMax-M3

77.7Qwen3.7 Plus

SWE-Pro

59.0MiniMax-M3

57.6Qwen3.7 Plus

Terminal-Bench

66.0MiniMax-M3

70.3Qwen3.7 Plus

OSWorld

70.1MiniMax-M3

73.3Qwen3.7 Plus

MCP Atlas

74.2MiniMax-M3

73.2Qwen3.7 Plus

Finance Agent

48.3MiniMax-M3

38.2Qwen3.7 Plus

MMMU-Pro

78.1MiniMax-M3

79.0Qwen3.7 Plus

MiniMax-M3

Input$0.30

Output$1.20

Workload$0.54

Context1M

Qwen3.7 Plus

Input$0.40

Output$1.60

Workload$0.72

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More MiniMax-M3 and Qwen3.7 Plus comparisons

Explore how MiniMax-M3 and Qwen3.7 Plus stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5 vs MiniMax-M3 Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus GPT-5.6 Sol vs MiniMax-M3 GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.7 Plus Kimi K3 vs MiniMax-M3 Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.7 Plus Claude Opus 4.8 vs MiniMax-M3 Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3.7 Plus Grok 4.5 vs MiniMax-M3 Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.