How do Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.8 Max 0902?

AskClash compares Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard Muse Spark 1.1 model page Qwen3.8 Max 0902 model page

Rank #20 vs #27AskClash overall scores 54.7 vs 39.0.

Pricing $1.25/$4.25 vs $2.00/$6.00Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryMeta vs Alibaba.

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Muse Spark 1.1	Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Overall Score	54.7	39.0
Leaderboard Rank	#20	#27
ACB	51.3	—
RWT	7.5	—
HLE	62.1	43.6
GPQA	—	92.6
IFEval	—	82.8
SWE-Pro	61.5	67.7
SWE-Atlas	—	66.3
Terminal-Bench	80.0	86.6
DeepSWE	53.3	69.3
GDPval-AA	1381.0	—
OSWorld	80.8	86.1
MCP Atlas	88.1	—
Finance Agent	57.2	—
CharXiv	88.4	88.4
MMMU-Pro	—	82.7
MRCR	54.1	92.9
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$1.25	$2.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$4.25	$6.00
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	12	11

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 head-to-head charts

Muse Spark 1.1 leads 2 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 leads 5 of 8 shared benchmarks. Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Muse Spark 1.1Qwen3.8 Max 0902

Overall

54.7Muse Spark 1.1

39.0Qwen3.8 Max 0902

HLE

62.1Muse Spark 1.1

43.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902

SWE-Pro

61.5Muse Spark 1.1

67.7Qwen3.8 Max 0902

Terminal-Bench

80.0Muse Spark 1.1

86.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902

DeepSWE

53.3Muse Spark 1.1

69.3Qwen3.8 Max 0902

OSWorld

80.8Muse Spark 1.1

86.1Qwen3.8 Max 0902

CharXiv

88.4Muse Spark 1.1

88.4Qwen3.8 Max 0902

MRCR

54.1Muse Spark 1.1

92.9Qwen3.8 Max 0902

Muse Spark 1.1

Input$1.25

Output$4.25

Workload$2.10

Context1M

Qwen3.8 Max 0902

Input$2.00

Output$6.00

Workload$3.20

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 comparisons

Explore how Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 Claude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 GPT-5.6 Sol vs Muse Spark 1.1 GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 Grok 4.6 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.