LLM Comparison

Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardQwen3.8 Flash Next model pageQwen3.8 Max 0902 model page
Rank #16 vs #27AskClash overall scores 57.9 vs 39.0.
Pricing $0.16/$0.47 vs $2.00/$6.00Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs ProprietaryAlibaba vs Alibaba.

Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricQwen3.8 Flash NextQwen3.8 Max 0902
Overall Score57.939.0
Leaderboard Rank#16#27
ACB66.5—
HLE35.943.6
GPQA91.792.6
IFEval81.382.8
SWE-Pro62.567.7
SWE-Atlas—66.3
Terminal-Bench—86.6
DeepSWE58.769.3
GDPval-AA1743.0—
OSWorld—86.1
CharXiv90.688.4
MMMU-Pro—82.7
MRCR—92.9
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$0.16$2.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$0.47$6.00
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published911

Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 head-to-head charts

Qwen3.8 Flash Next leads 2 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 leads 5 of 7 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Flash Next is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.8 Flash NextQwen3.8 Max 0902
Overall
57.9Qwen3.8 Flash Next
39.0Qwen3.8 Max 0902
HLE
35.9Qwen3.8 Flash Next
43.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902
GPQA
91.7Qwen3.8 Flash Next
92.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902
IFEval
81.3Qwen3.8 Flash Next
82.8Qwen3.8 Max 0902
SWE-Pro
62.5Qwen3.8 Flash Next
67.7Qwen3.8 Max 0902
DeepSWE
58.7Qwen3.8 Flash Next
69.3Qwen3.8 Max 0902
CharXiv
90.6Qwen3.8 Flash Next
88.4Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Input$0.16
Output$0.47
Workload$0.25
Context1M
Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Input$2.00
Output$6.00
Workload$3.20
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.8 Flash Next and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.8 Flash Next and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextGPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextGrok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.