LLM Comparison

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Claude Sonnet 5: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Claude Sonnet 5 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardQwen3.8 Max 0902 model pageClaude Sonnet 5 model page
Rank #9 vs #16AskClash overall scores 70.0 vs 61.8.
Pricing $2.00/$6.00 vs $3.00/$15.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryAlibaba vs Anthropic.

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Claude Sonnet 5 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricQwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Sonnet 5
Overall Score70.061.8
Leaderboard Rank#9#16
ACB59.060.8
RWT—8.5
HLE43.657.4
GPQA92.691.1
IFEval82.8—
SWE-bench—85.2
SWE-Pro67.763.2
SWE-Atlas66.3—
Terminal-Bench86.680.4
DeepSWE69.353.8
GDPval-AA—1618.0
OSWorld86.181.2
CharXiv88.488.3
MMMU-Pro82.777.3
MRCR92.9—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$2.00$3.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$6.00$15.0
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published1212

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Claude Sonnet 5 head-to-head charts

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 leads 8 and Claude Sonnet 5 leads 2 of 10 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Max 0902 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Sonnet 5
Overall
70.0Qwen3.8 Max 0902
61.8Claude Sonnet 5
ACB
59.0Qwen3.8 Max 0902
60.8Claude Sonnet 5
HLE
43.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902
57.4Claude Sonnet 5
GPQA
92.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902
91.1Claude Sonnet 5
SWE-Pro
67.7Qwen3.8 Max 0902
63.2Claude Sonnet 5
Terminal-Bench
86.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902
80.4Claude Sonnet 5
DeepSWE
69.3Qwen3.8 Max 0902
53.8Claude Sonnet 5
OSWorld
86.1Qwen3.8 Max 0902
81.2Claude Sonnet 5
CharXiv
88.4Qwen3.8 Max 0902
88.3Claude Sonnet 5
MMMU-Pro
82.7Qwen3.8 Max 0902
77.3Claude Sonnet 5
Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Input$2.00
Output$6.00
Workload$3.20
Context1M
Claude Sonnet 5
Input$3.00
Output$15.0
Workload$6.00
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.8 Max 0902 and Claude Sonnet 5 comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.8 Max 0902 and Claude Sonnet 5 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902GLM-5.3 vs Claude Sonnet 5Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Grok 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 5

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.