Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Rank #9 vs #34AskClash overall scores 70.0 vs 36.1.
Pricing $2.00/$6.00 vs $2.00/$12.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryAlibaba vs Google.
Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | Qwen3.8 Max 0902 | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 70.0 | 36.1 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #9 | #34 |
| ACB | 59.0 | — |
| Coding Agent Index | — | 32.9 |
| HLE | 43.6 | 51.4 |
| GPQA | 92.6 | 94.3 |
| IFEval | 82.8 | — |
| SWE-bench | — | 80.6 |
| SWE-Pro | 67.7 | 54.2 |
| SWE-Atlas | 66.3 | — |
| Terminal-Bench | 86.6 | 68.5 |
| DeepSWE | 69.3 | 11.7 |
| GDPval-AA | — | 1317.0 |
| OSWorld | 86.1 | — |
| MCP Atlas | — | 69.2 |
| Finance Agent | — | 43.0 |
| CharXiv | 88.4 | 80.2 |
| MMMU-Pro | 82.7 | 83.9 |
| ARC-AGI 2 | — | 77.1 |
| Tau2 | — | 99.3 |
| MRCR | 92.9 | 84.9 |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $2.00 | $2.00 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $6.00 | $12.0 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1M |
| Benchmarks Published | 12 | 16 |
Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro head-to-head charts
Qwen3.8 Max 0902 leads 6 and Gemini 3.1 Pro leads 3 of 9 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Max 0902 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
Qwen3.8 Max 0902Gemini 3.1 Pro
Overall
HLE
GPQA
SWE-Pro
Terminal-Bench
DeepSWE
CharXiv
MMMU-Pro
MRCR
Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Input$2.00
Output$6.00
Workload$3.20
Context1M
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Input$2.00
Output$12.0
Workload$4.40
Context1M
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More Qwen3.8 Max 0902 and Gemini 3.1 Pro comparisons
Explore how Qwen3.8 Max 0902 and Gemini 3.1 Pro stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.1 ProClaude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.1 ProClaude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.1 ProGLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902GLM-5.3 vs Gemini 3.1 ProGrok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Grok 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.