LLM Comparison

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardQwen3.8 Max 0902 model pageGemini 3.7 Flash model page
Rank #9 vs #13AskClash overall scores 70.0 vs 66.8.
Pricing $2.00/$6.00 vs $1.50/$7.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryAlibaba vs Google.

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricQwen3.8 Max 0902Gemini 3.7 Flash
Overall Score70.066.8
Leaderboard Rank#9#13
ACB59.038.9
HLE43.653.6
GPQA92.694.5
IFEval82.8—
SWE-Pro67.7—
SWE-Atlas66.3—
Terminal-Bench86.685.8
DeepSWE69.365.3
GDPval-AA—1525.0
OSWorld86.1—
Finance Agent—59.0
CharXiv88.484.5
MMMU-Pro82.785.5
MRCR92.997.0
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$2.00$1.50
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$6.00$7.50
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published1211

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash head-to-head charts

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 leads 5 and Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 4 of 9 shared benchmarks. Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.8 Max 0902Gemini 3.7 Flash
Overall
70.0Qwen3.8 Max 0902
66.8Gemini 3.7 Flash
ACB
59.0Qwen3.8 Max 0902
38.9Gemini 3.7 Flash
HLE
43.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902
53.6Gemini 3.7 Flash
GPQA
92.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902
94.5Gemini 3.7 Flash
Terminal-Bench
86.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902
85.8Gemini 3.7 Flash
DeepSWE
69.3Qwen3.8 Max 0902
65.3Gemini 3.7 Flash
CharXiv
88.4Qwen3.8 Max 0902
84.5Gemini 3.7 Flash
MMMU-Pro
82.7Qwen3.8 Max 0902
85.5Gemini 3.7 Flash
MRCR
92.9Qwen3.8 Max 0902
97.0Gemini 3.7 Flash
Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Input$2.00
Output$6.00
Workload$3.20
Context1M
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Input$1.50
Output$7.50
Workload$3.00
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.8 Max 0902 and Gemini 3.7 Flash comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.8 Max 0902 and Gemini 3.7 Flash stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.7 FlashClaude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.7 FlashClaude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.7 FlashGLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902GLM-5.3 vs Gemini 3.7 FlashGrok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Grok 4.6 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.