How do Qwen3.8 Max 0902 and Muse Spark 1.1 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Qwen3.8 Max 0902 and Muse Spark 1.1 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Muse Spark 1.1: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: Qwen3.8 Max 0902 or Muse Spark 1.1?

AskClash compares Qwen3.8 Max 0902 and Muse Spark 1.1 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Muse Spark 1.1 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard Qwen3.8 Max 0902 model page Muse Spark 1.1 model page

Rank #9 vs #19AskClash overall scores 70.0 vs 58.1.

Pricing $2.00/$6.00 vs $1.25/$4.25Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryAlibaba vs Meta.

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Muse Spark 1.1 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Qwen3.8 Max 0902	Muse Spark 1.1
Overall Score	70.0	58.1
Leaderboard Rank	#9	#19
ACB	59.0	51.3
RWT	—	7.5
HLE	43.6	62.1
GPQA	92.6	—
IFEval	82.8	—
SWE-Pro	67.7	61.5
SWE-Atlas	66.3	—
Terminal-Bench	86.6	80.0
DeepSWE	69.3	53.3
GDPval-AA	—	1381.0
OSWorld	86.1	80.8
MCP Atlas	—	88.1
Finance Agent	—	57.2
CharXiv	88.4	88.4
MMMU-Pro	82.7	—
MRCR	92.9	54.1
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$2.00	$1.25
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$6.00	$4.25
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	12	12

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Muse Spark 1.1 head-to-head charts

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 leads 7 and Muse Spark 1.1 leads 1 of 9 shared benchmarks. Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.8 Max 0902Muse Spark 1.1

Overall

70.0Qwen3.8 Max 0902

58.1Muse Spark 1.1

ACB

59.0Qwen3.8 Max 0902

51.3Muse Spark 1.1

HLE

43.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902

62.1Muse Spark 1.1

SWE-Pro

67.7Qwen3.8 Max 0902

61.5Muse Spark 1.1

Terminal-Bench

86.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902

80.0Muse Spark 1.1

DeepSWE

69.3Qwen3.8 Max 0902

53.3Muse Spark 1.1

OSWorld

86.1Qwen3.8 Max 0902

80.8Muse Spark 1.1

CharXiv

88.4Qwen3.8 Max 0902

88.4Muse Spark 1.1

MRCR

92.9Qwen3.8 Max 0902

54.1Muse Spark 1.1

Qwen3.8 Max 0902

Input$2.00

Output$6.00

Workload$3.20

Context1M

Muse Spark 1.1

Input$1.25

Output$4.25

Workload$2.10

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.8 Max 0902 and Muse Spark 1.1 comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.8 Max 0902 and Muse Spark 1.1 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 Claude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1 GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 GLM-5.3 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 Grok 4.6 vs Muse Spark 1.1

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.