Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Rank #9 vs #21AskClash overall scores 70.0 vs 56.5.
Pricing $2.00/$6.00 vs $0.16/$0.47Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightAlibaba vs Alibaba.
Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | Qwen3.8 Max 0902 | Qwen3.8 Flash Next |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 70.0 | 56.5 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #9 | #21 |
| ACB | 59.0 | 66.5 |
| HLE | 43.6 | 35.9 |
| GPQA | 92.6 | 91.7 |
| IFEval | 82.8 | 81.3 |
| SWE-Pro | 67.7 | 62.5 |
| SWE-Atlas | 66.3 | — |
| Terminal-Bench | 86.6 | — |
| DeepSWE | 69.3 | 58.7 |
| GDPval-AA | — | 1743.0 |
| OSWorld | 86.1 | — |
| CharXiv | 88.4 | 90.6 |
| MMMU-Pro | 82.7 | — |
| MRCR | 92.9 | — |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $2.00 | $0.16 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $6.00 | $0.47 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1M |
| Benchmarks Published | 12 | 9 |
Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next head-to-head charts
Qwen3.8 Max 0902 leads 6 and Qwen3.8 Flash Next leads 2 of 8 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Flash Next is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
Qwen3.8 Max 0902Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Overall
ACB
HLE
GPQA
IFEval
SWE-Pro
DeepSWE
CharXiv
Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Input$2.00
Output$6.00
Workload$3.20
Context1M
Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Input$0.16
Output$0.47
Workload$0.25
Context1M
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More Qwen3.8 Max 0902 and Qwen3.8 Flash Next comparisons
Explore how Qwen3.8 Max 0902 and Qwen3.8 Flash Next stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextGLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextGrok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.