Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Plus: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Plus comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ranks higher (#64 vs #128) and wins 3 of 4 shared benchmarks; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less ($0.15/$0.60 vs $0.40/$1.60 per 1M tokens).
Rank #64 vs #128AskClash overall scores 57.3 vs 36.4.
Pricing $0.15/$0.60 vs $0.40/$1.60Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
API vs ProprietaryDeepSeek vs Alibaba.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Plus benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 57.3 | 36.4 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #64 | #128 |
| ACB | 63.0 | — |
| RWT | — | 7.5 |
| HLE | 36.8 | 34.7 |
| GPQA | 90.9 | 90.3 |
| IFEval | — | 94.6 |
| SWE-bench | — | 77.7 |
| SWE-Pro | — | 57.6 |
| Terminal-Bench | 26.8 | — |
| DeepSWE | 74.2 | — |
| GDPval-AA | 1600.0 | 1522.1 |
| OSWorld | — | 73.3 |
| MCP Atlas | — | 73.2 |
| Finance Agent | — | 38.2 |
| CharXiv | — | 85.9 |
| MMMU-Pro | 77.0 | 79.0 |
| Tau2 | — | 93.0 |
| MRCR | — | 91.7 |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.15 | $0.40 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.60 | $1.60 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1M |
| Benchmarks Published | 10 | 11 |
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Plus head-to-head charts
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 4 and Qwen3.7 Plus leads 1 of 5 shared benchmarks. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashQwen3.7 Plus
Overall
HLE
GPQA
GDPval-AA
MMMU-Pro
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Input$0.15
Output$0.60
Workload$0.27
Context1M
Qwen3.7 Plus
Input$0.40
Output$1.60
Workload$0.72
Context1M
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Qwen3.7 Plus comparisons
Explore how DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Qwen3.7 Plus stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashKimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.7 PlusClaude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.7 PlusClaude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.7 PlusClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.7 PlusClaude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.