How do Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.7 Plus: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

AskClash compares Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.7 Plus comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard Muse Spark 1.1 model page Qwen3.7 Plus model page

Rank #6 vs #21AskClash overall scores 77.5 vs 55.7.

Pricing $1.25/$4.25 vs $0.40/$1.60Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryMeta vs Alibaba.

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.7 Plus benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Muse Spark 1.1	Qwen3.7 Plus
Overall Score	77.5	55.7
Leaderboard Rank	#6	#21
RWT	7.5	7.5
HLE	62.1	34.7
GPQA	—	90.3
IFEval	—	94.6
SWE-bench	—	77.7
SWE-Pro	61.5	57.6
Terminal-Bench	80.0	70.3
OSWorld	80.8	73.3
MCP Atlas	88.1	73.2
Finance Agent	57.2	38.2
CharXiv	88.4	85.9
MMMU-Pro	—	79.0
Tau2	—	93.0
MRCR	54.1	91.7
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$1.25	$0.40
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$4.25	$1.60
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	9	15

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.7 Plus head-to-head charts

Muse Spark 1.1 leads 8 and Qwen3.7 Plus leads 1 of 10 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Muse Spark 1.1Qwen3.7 Plus

Overall

77.5Muse Spark 1.1

55.7Qwen3.7 Plus

RWT

7.5Muse Spark 1.1

7.5Qwen3.7 Plus

HLE

62.1Muse Spark 1.1

34.7Qwen3.7 Plus

SWE-Pro

61.5Muse Spark 1.1

57.6Qwen3.7 Plus

Terminal-Bench

80.0Muse Spark 1.1

70.3Qwen3.7 Plus

OSWorld

80.8Muse Spark 1.1

73.3Qwen3.7 Plus

MCP Atlas

88.1Muse Spark 1.1

73.2Qwen3.7 Plus

Finance Agent

57.2Muse Spark 1.1

38.2Qwen3.7 Plus

CharXiv

88.4Muse Spark 1.1

85.9Qwen3.7 Plus

MRCR

54.1Muse Spark 1.1

91.7Qwen3.7 Plus

Muse Spark 1.1

Input$1.25

Output$4.25

Workload$2.10

Context1M

Qwen3.7 Plus

Input$0.40

Output$1.60

Workload$0.72

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus comparisons

Explore how Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus GPT-5.6 Sol vs Muse Spark 1.1 GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.7 Plus Kimi K3 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.7 Plus Claude Opus 4.8 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3.7 Plus Grok 4.5 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.