LLM Comparison

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Qwen3.7 Plus: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Qwen3.7 Plus comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardQwen3.8 Max 0902 model pageQwen3.7 Plus model page
Rank #9 vs #41AskClash overall scores 70.0 vs 31.1.
Pricing $2.00/$6.00 vs $0.40/$1.60Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryAlibaba vs Alibaba.

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Qwen3.7 Plus benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricQwen3.8 Max 0902Qwen3.7 Plus
Overall Score70.031.1
Leaderboard Rank#9#41
ACB59.0—
RWT—7.5
HLE43.634.7
GPQA92.690.3
IFEval82.894.6
SWE-bench—77.7
SWE-Pro67.757.6
SWE-Atlas66.3—
Terminal-Bench86.670.3
DeepSWE69.3—
GDPval-AA—1522.1
OSWorld86.173.3
MCP Atlas—73.2
Finance Agent—38.2
CharXiv88.485.9
MMMU-Pro82.779.0
Tau2—93.0
MRCR92.991.7
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$2.00$0.40
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$6.00$1.60
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published1215

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Qwen3.7 Plus head-to-head charts

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 leads 9 and Qwen3.7 Plus leads 1 of 10 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.8 Max 0902Qwen3.7 Plus
Overall
70.0Qwen3.8 Max 0902
31.1Qwen3.7 Plus
HLE
43.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902
34.7Qwen3.7 Plus
GPQA
92.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902
90.3Qwen3.7 Plus
IFEval
82.8Qwen3.8 Max 0902
94.6Qwen3.7 Plus
SWE-Pro
67.7Qwen3.8 Max 0902
57.6Qwen3.7 Plus
Terminal-Bench
86.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902
70.3Qwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld
86.1Qwen3.8 Max 0902
73.3Qwen3.7 Plus
CharXiv
88.4Qwen3.8 Max 0902
85.9Qwen3.7 Plus
MMMU-Pro
82.7Qwen3.8 Max 0902
79.0Qwen3.7 Plus
MRCR
92.9Qwen3.8 Max 0902
91.7Qwen3.7 Plus
Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Input$2.00
Output$6.00
Workload$3.20
Context1M
Qwen3.7 Plus
Input$0.40
Output$1.60
Workload$0.72
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.8 Max 0902 and Qwen3.7 Plus comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.8 Max 0902 and Qwen3.7 Plus stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.7 PlusClaude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.7 PlusClaude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.7 PlusGLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.7 PlusGrok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.