LLM Comparison

Qwen3.7 Plus vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Qwen3.7 Plus vs Gemini 3.6 Flash comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardQwen3.7 Plus model pageGemini 3.6 Flash model page
Rank #20 vs #22AskClash overall scores 55.8 vs 55.3.
Pricing $0.40/$1.60 vs $1.50/$7.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryAlibaba vs Google.

Qwen3.7 Plus vs Gemini 3.6 Flash benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricQwen3.7 PlusGemini 3.6 Flash
Overall Score55.855.3
Leaderboard Rank#20#22
RWT7.5—
HLE34.738.0
GPQA90.392.8
IFEval94.6—
SWE-bench77.7—
SWE-Pro57.658.7
Terminal-Bench70.378.0
DeepSWE—49.0
OSWorld73.383.0
MCP Atlas73.2—
Finance Agent38.256.3
CharXiv85.985.2
MMMU-Pro79.083.2
Tau293.0—
MRCR91.791.8
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$0.40$1.50
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$1.60$7.50
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published1513

Qwen3.7 Plus vs Gemini 3.6 Flash head-to-head charts

Qwen3.7 Plus leads 2 and Gemini 3.6 Flash leads 8 of 10 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.7 PlusGemini 3.6 Flash
Overall
55.8Qwen3.7 Plus
55.3Gemini 3.6 Flash
HLE
34.7Qwen3.7 Plus
38.0Gemini 3.6 Flash
GPQA
90.3Qwen3.7 Plus
92.8Gemini 3.6 Flash
SWE-Pro
57.6Qwen3.7 Plus
58.7Gemini 3.6 Flash
Terminal-Bench
70.3Qwen3.7 Plus
78.0Gemini 3.6 Flash
OSWorld
73.3Qwen3.7 Plus
83.0Gemini 3.6 Flash
Finance Agent
38.2Qwen3.7 Plus
56.3Gemini 3.6 Flash
CharXiv
85.9Qwen3.7 Plus
85.2Gemini 3.6 Flash
MMMU-Pro
79.0Qwen3.7 Plus
83.2Gemini 3.6 Flash
MRCR
91.7Qwen3.7 Plus
91.8Gemini 3.6 Flash
Qwen3.7 Plus
Input$0.40
Output$1.60
Workload$0.72
Context1M
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Input$1.50
Output$7.50
Workload$3.00
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.7 Plus and Gemini 3.6 Flash comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.7 Plus and Gemini 3.6 Flash stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.7 PlusClaude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.6 FlashClaude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.7 PlusClaude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.6 FlashGPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.7 PlusGPT-5.6 Sol vs Gemini 3.6 FlashClaude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3.7 PlusClaude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 3.6 FlashClaude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen3.7 PlusClaude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.